Subject: Re: bug#64546: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Add support for explicitly-remote commands in Eshell

From: Jim Porter <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:54:14 -0700

On 7/10/2023 10:38 AM, Michael Albinus wrote:
> Since a while, I have the feeling we would need only 'doas' and 'sudo'
> as built-in, in order to apply 'sudo COMMAND' or so. 'su' isn't needed,
> it is equivalent to 'cd /su::'. But I don't know whether we shall remove
> it; people might have adapted their workflow to use it.

Hmm, maybe a user option like 'eshell-tramp-enable-subshell-commands'? 
Then we could add 'eshell/ssh' as well, and turn that on/off along with 
'eshell/su' with that option.