GNU bug report logs -
#64527
[PATCH 1/2] gnu: bees: Update to 0.10.
Previous Next
Reported by: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 03:47:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 19 Jul 2023 21:44:52 +0800
with message-id <87a5vsqaln.wl-hako <at> ultrarare.space>
and subject line Re: bug#64527: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: bees: Update to 0.10.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64527,
regarding [PATCH 1/2] gnu: bees: Update to 0.10.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
64527: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64527
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
* gnu/packages/file-systems.scm (bees): Update to 0.10.
---
gnu/packages/file-systems.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
index dd84696316..0b024d6b92 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ (define-public fuse-overlayfs
(define-public bees
(package
(name "bees")
- (version "0.9.2")
+ (version "0.10")
(source (origin
(method git-fetch)
(uri (git-reference
@@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ (define-public bees
(("#include .crucible/city.h.") "#include <city.h>"))))
(sha256
(base32
- "0xik1xg6ma5yglhvs60ny27242iapqwzikmqbgij1avjffs6776a"))))
+ "1j1v9bxijs8gvrb7rg0q1158xjvmfc8dlzwx768fxf3w8w2gfwvz"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
(list #:test-target "test"
base-commit: 3db685cb2e2ce2a4b29c62d28a66201b2eba018f
--
2.40.1
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:42:15 +0800,
宋文武 wrote:
> Hello, does the 'substitute*' broken? or why should we prefer
> wrap-script over hardcode paths in the original executables?
Nevermind, I'm still confused about whether to make a wrapper or not.
But since it's not the preferred way (I thought it was), I'll reduce
its use in the future.
Thanks
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 20 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.