GNU bug report logs - #64496
describe-key vs. view-lossage

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:19:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 64496 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 64496 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#64496; Package emacs. (Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: describe-key vs. view-lossage
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:54:17 -0500

 a			 ;; self-insert-command
 b			 ;; self-insert-command
 c			 ;; self-insert-command
 C-h k			 ;; describe-key
 <up> C-x b		 ;; switch-to-buffer
 <return>		 ;; minibuffer-complete-and-exit
 C-h l			 ;; view-lossage

Above, the <up> should not be put on the same line. It just doesn't make
sense. If it must be on the same line, put it on the back of the
previous line.

emacs-version "28.2"
Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#64496; Package emacs. (Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 64496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: 64496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64496: describe-key vs. view-lossage
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 17:52:13 +0300

tags 64496 wontfix
close 64496
thanks

> From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:54:17 -0500
> 
>  a			 ;; self-insert-command
>  b			 ;; self-insert-command
>  c			 ;; self-insert-command
>  C-h k			 ;; describe-key
>  <up> C-x b		 ;; switch-to-buffer
>  <return>		 ;; minibuffer-complete-and-exit
>  C-h l			 ;; view-lossage
> 
> Above, the <up> should not be put on the same line. It just doesn't make
> sense. If it must be on the same line, put it on the back of the
> previous line.

I see no reason to do anything about this.

Closing.
Added tag(s) wontfix. Request was from Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to 64496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> Request was from Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 04 Aug 2023 11:24:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 36 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.