GNU bug report logs - #64459
30.0.50; Edebug can't instrument certain syntax-propertize-rules forms

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 13:36:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>, 64459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#64459: 30.0.50; Edebug can't instrument certain syntax-propertize-rules forms
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 08:43:15 -0400
>> > > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
>> > > index d610fa005cc..002a24af18b 100644
>> > > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
>> > > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
>> > > @@ -249,11 +249,12 @@ syntax-propertize-rules
>> > >  Note: There may be at most nine back-references in the REGEXPs of
>> > >  all RULES in total."
>> > >    (declare (debug (&rest &or symbolp    ;FIXME: edebug this eval step.
>> > > -                         (form &rest
>> > > -                               (numberp
>> > > -                                [&or stringp ;FIXME: Use &wrap
>> > > -                                     ("prog1" [&or stringp def-form] def-body)
>> > > -                                     def-form])))))
>> > > +                         (def-form
>> > > +                          &rest
>> > > +                          (numberp
>> > > +                           [&or stringp ;FIXME: Use &wrap
>> > > +                                ("prog1" [&or stringp form] def-body)
>> > > +                                form])))))
>> > >    (let ((newrules nil))
>> > >      (while rules
>> > >        (if (symbolp (car rules))
>> >
>> > No, this one introduces a regression.  Try that one:
>> >
>> 
>> Yeah, that works at least in the cases I've tested. Thanks!
>
> Stefan, this is for master, right?

Yes: if you want it for `emacs-29`, I do think it's perfectly safe (it
just replaces the one `form` with `def-form`), but I don't see any
urgency here.


        Stefan





This bug report was last modified 2 years and 38 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.