GNU bug report logs -
#6442
About the modifier of -k option in sort
Previous Next
Reported by: Peng Yu <pengyu.ut <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:08:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 6529
Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #11 received at 6442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
2010/6/17 Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigbrady.com>:
> On 17/06/10 03:07, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The modifiers of -k are discussed in the examples in 'info sort'
>> rather than in the main entry of "-k". I feel that this be improved by
>> clearly describe each modifier under the main entry of "-k". It is not
>> very clear to how many modifiers there are.
>>
>
> The sort --help (man) output has been improved lately,
> to group the ordering options, and these are referenced in
> the detailed description of POS
> You are looking at the latest version right?
> Would the following be enough to highlight the info you might have missed?
>
> --- a/src/sort.c
> +++ b/src/sort.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ Other options:\n\
> "), stdout);
> fputs (_("\
> -k, --key=POS1[,POS2] start a key at POS1 (origin 1), end it at POS2\n\
> - (default end of line)\n\
> + (default end of line). See POS syntax below\n\
> -m, --merge merge already sorted files; do not sort\n\
> "), stdout);
> fputs (_("\
Is it in the latest version? If yes, I'll install it.
coreutils-8.5.tar.xz.sig 23-Apr-2010 12:42 836
BTW, how to figure out what version of my coreutils is? I 'man sort',
it shows the following at the bottom of that page. I don't understand
7.4 is of date March 2010, it should be May 2009 according to
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/, right?
GNU coreutils 7.4 March 2010 SORT(1)
--
Regards,
Peng
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 336 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.