From unknown Wed Jun 25 05:38:53 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#6442 <6442@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#6442 <6442@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: About the modifier of -k option in sort Reply-To: bug#6442 <6442@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:38:53 +0000 retitle 6442 About the modifier of -k option in sort reassign 6442 coreutils submitter 6442 Peng Yu severity 6442 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 16 22:07:37 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2010 02:07:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP4W1-0003bT-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:07:37 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP4Vz-0003bN-4L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:07:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:42471) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OP4Vv-00054R-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:07:31 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52675 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OP4Vt-0004Zo-Dv for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:07:30 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP4Vs-00076g-3z for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:07:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:59086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP4Vr-00076a-WE for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:07:28 -0400 Received: by yxf34 with SMTP id 34so1715414yxf.0 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:07:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=22gvsKK7bXvgcIsMKhUGxXPimMRqjmMPEdmbIBz8IEU=; b=l2W74MiOTq/FC0PbOEaNBKKVBw5S7b3BW1Cr6OAAGOF0Rd2KzgQyh3QU4GYrgqMLsR T+ckWnVRxDE/1Up8sPl3K2/WypBh3iY8dxNn2Z/it+6ioOD3zZfwIIRsbYbo5vBZS/T8 LFpydTlRgsYSju1wIo96LIvK7B0rOQZdGHwfc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=H54ltqobCbBCrH1tlRiULAT3GlfLkxLoFG3UFa4UG//HIIKaA3CXbFj6zAQD/H6cKv p+Qae5CguQx1jmcUtdpW88BphapkPNJ4UVbLaPT8zjg6oWZbO/4fcOGfORY8RM/lj32A Lr/lUj0E27cPR0d2sPdvP/wiKs15NXRo/9OJU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.14.2 with SMTP id 2mr11301270ybn.12.1276740447288; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.26.11 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:07:27 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: About the modifier of -k option in sort From: Peng Yu To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) Hello, The modifiers of -k are discussed in the examples in 'info sort' rather than in the main entry of "-k". I feel that this be improved by clearly describe each modifier under the main entry of "-k". It is not very clear to how many modifiers there are. -- Regards, Peng From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 17 04:31:29 2010 Received: (at 6442) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2010 08:31:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPAVU-0006Gy-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:31:28 -0400 Received: from mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net ([84.203.253.98]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPAVS-0006Gs-MH for 6442@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:31:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 9269 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2010 08:31:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.25?) (84.203.137.218) by mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net with SMTP; 17 Jun 2010 08:31:22 -0000 Message-ID: <4C19DD08.70309@draigBrady.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:30:00 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peng Yu Subject: Re: bug#6442: About the modifier of -k option in sort References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6442 Cc: 6442@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) On 17/06/10 03:07, Peng Yu wrote: > Hello, > > The modifiers of -k are discussed in the examples in 'info sort' > rather than in the main entry of "-k". I feel that this be improved by > clearly describe each modifier under the main entry of "-k". It is not > very clear to how many modifiers there are. > The sort --help (man) output has been improved lately, to group the ordering options, and these are referenced in the detailed description of POS You are looking at the latest version right? Would the following be enough to highlight the info you might have missed? --- a/src/sort.c +++ b/src/sort.c @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ Other options:\n\ "), stdout); fputs (_("\ -k, --key=POS1[,POS2] start a key at POS1 (origin 1), end it at POS2\n\ - (default end of line)\n\ + (default end of line). See POS syntax below\n\ -m, --merge merge already sorted files; do not sort\n\ "), stdout); fputs (_("\ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 17 17:11:37 2010 Received: (at 6442) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2010 21:11:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPMN6-0004Sl-R2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:11:37 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPMN4-0004Sf-Nt for 6442@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:11:35 -0400 Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so343184gyh.3 for <6442@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gVSue2PKBp4pFtb1x7i00Np6jZT7+iNC+GrNHO0TxFI=; b=AoIrecoHs4yQZvcgYMUD4BWIy/9mF5BcPfu5yitX8jkWX30QvG8Ev0LxGxCHoRoomQ LdiM+NE4WVb4SGMZkBLRBioYBMPuTfQvb6DvBgonoTVQDow1EfZTHBCnwXR1ZLIqVXPK AvvuKMJVaOUDdvNGxAuHJ0Sahntdb4H8KA4wI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KagcF5a4SFzfhP9BftwY6aoujMH1Q01hNMGMWrV9dmxkIaihRbTtig2gJ4wnLHZ8XB wNO9DJ/m/K46qod8CswiAFasAJlfj5vohPL/hqbk3LdYPAsDB+0qmpBQQCVmEW3DuwEK vTszcotwuBF1v+zpXuVkkXpVHKkTOA9DJPBac= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.240.8 with SMTP id n8mr50755ybh.409.1276809089669; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.26.11 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:11:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C19DD08.70309@draigBrady.com> References: <4C19DD08.70309@draigBrady.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:11:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6442: About the modifier of -k option in sort From: Peng Yu To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6442 Cc: 6442@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) 2010/6/17 P=E1draig Brady : > On 17/06/10 03:07, Peng Yu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The modifiers of -k are discussed in the examples in 'info sort' >> rather than in the main entry of "-k". I feel that this be improved by >> clearly describe each modifier under the main entry of "-k". It is not >> very clear to how many modifiers there are. >> > > The sort --help (man) output has been improved lately, > to group the ordering options, and these are referenced in > the detailed description of POS > You are looking at the latest version right? > Would the following be enough to highlight the info you might have missed= ? > > --- a/src/sort.c > +++ b/src/sort.c > @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ Other options:\n\ > =A0"), stdout); > =A0 =A0 =A0 fputs (_("\ > =A0 -k, --key=3DPOS1[,POS2] =A0 =A0 start a key at POS1 (origin 1), end i= t at POS2\n\ > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(default end of = line)\n\ > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(default end of = line). =A0See POS syntax below\n\ > =A0 -m, --merge =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 merge already sorted files; d= o not sort\n\ > =A0"), stdout); > =A0 =A0 =A0 fputs (_("\ Is it in the latest version? If yes, I'll install it. coreutils-8.5.tar.xz.sig 23-Apr-2010 12:42 836 BTW, how to figure out what version of my coreutils is? I 'man sort', it shows the following at the bottom of that page. I don't understand 7.4 is of date March 2010, it should be May 2009 according to http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/, right? GNU coreutils 7.4 March 2010 SORT= (1) --=20 Regards, Peng From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 17 17:35:25 2010 Received: (at 6442) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2010 21:35:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPMk9-0004cy-9z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:35:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPMk7-0004cr-57 for 6442@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:35:24 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5HLZINX012907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:35:18 -0400 Received: from [10.3.225.162] (vpn-225-162.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.162]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5HLZHg6031734; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:35:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4C1A94DB.2050400@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:34:19 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.2 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peng Yu Subject: Re: bug#6442: About the modifier of -k option in sort References: <4C19DD08.70309@draigBrady.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5EB6797F527D7C04EE25C193" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-Spam-Score: -10.1 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6442 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= , 6442@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.1 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5EB6797F527D7C04EE25C193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/17/2010 03:11 PM, Peng Yu wrote: >> You are looking at the latest version right? >> Would the following be enough to highlight the info you might have mis= sed? >> >> --- a/src/sort.c >> +++ b/src/sort.c >> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ Other options:\n\ >> "), stdout); >> fputs (_("\ >> -k, --key=3DPOS1[,POS2] start a key at POS1 (origin 1), end it a= t POS2\n\ >> - (default end of line)\n\ >> + (default end of line). See POS syntax be= low\n\ >> -m, --merge merge already sorted files; do not sort\n\= >> "), stdout); >> fputs (_("\ >=20 > Is it in the latest version? If yes, I'll install it. > coreutils-8.5.tar.xz.sig 23-Apr-2010 12:42 836 No, the whole point of this patch is that it is for the latest coreutils.git, which is post 8.5 (but will be in 8.6 if you like how it is worded). >=20 > BTW, how to figure out what version of my coreutils is? I 'man sort', > it shows the following at the bottom of that page. I don't understand > 7.4 is of date March 2010, it should be May 2009 according to > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/, right? No, that just means that whoever pre-built coreutils 7.4 for your distro did so in March 2010, even though they used a tarball from May 2009. You can _always_ use 'sort --version' to find the actual version on your machine (and using --version works for almost every GNU program out there, the few exceptions being programs like /bin/test that have behavior mandated by POSIX when given a single argument). --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig5EB6797F527D7C04EE25C193 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMGpTbAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqTJYH/0z7+QeIy+1k5++6zegtndV1 XkAtdjOyZosEBXzUiPyrOyvmckc/zkTC5D3livO9VrZqGxEEgpC0XNdjs6ojjnzS erisSzgKyBQIAK7wYNEhgAC3MADl+cKoTCvl9RTtrfwpYLFUzJuqqY7q8wO4vXUx RC+Pj+7Qzg4F0s1tHuGPOCQ36ZvoNBxBYzzMNq40znz1Dnw8pFX7mZypGUvQd/jb I9CY/c6VedQV0NXWVkZ/5ADXgs1FiTyDbn5XQiuZkK9ObKgnG7Wz8D4vxb6mo8+x cRAzJ2n77n5kepZpJwGF9AYrOCq+p775S3EhAGPX4SJXdeq6eCupmsZ3cUGk/I0= =T6wk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5EB6797F527D7C04EE25C193-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 28 20:03:46 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2010 00:03:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTOIk-0005Xf-KZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:03:46 -0400 Received: from mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net ([84.203.253.98]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTOIj-0005XZ-3j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:03:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 68143 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 00:03:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.25?) (84.203.137.218) by mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 00:03:40 -0000 Message-ID: <4C29385A.3040807@draigBrady.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:03:38 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaWcgQnJhZHk=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) merge 6529 6442 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 28 20:24:57 2010 Received: (at 6442-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2010 00:24:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTOdE-0006He-Rw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:24:56 -0400 Received: from mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net ([84.203.253.98]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTOdD-0006HY-7w for 6442-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:24:55 -0400 Received: (qmail 70262 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 00:24:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.25?) (84.203.137.218) by mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 00:24:49 -0000 Message-ID: <4C293D4F.5070605@draigBrady.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:24:47 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 6442-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#6442: About the modifier of -k option in sort References: <4C19DD08.70309@draigBrady.com> In-Reply-To: <4C19DD08.70309@draigBrady.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6442-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) I've applied this doc tweak: On 17/06/10 09:30, Pádraig Brady wrote: > --- a/src/sort.c > +++ b/src/sort.c > @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ Other options:\n\ > "), stdout); > fputs (_("\ > -k, --key=POS1[,POS2] start a key at POS1 (origin 1), end it at POS2\n\ > - (default end of line)\n\ > + (default end of line). See POS syntax below\n\ > -m, --merge merge already sorted files; do not sort\n\ > "), stdout); > fputs (_("\ From unknown Wed Jun 25 05:38:53 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator