GNU bug report logs - #64347
30.0.50; Some customize faces shown as edited with -Q

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>

Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:16:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
Cc: stephen.berman <at> gmx.net, 64347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#64347: 30.0.50; Some customize faces shown as edited with -Q
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:47:53 +0300
> Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 20:12:38 -0300
> Cc: 64347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman <at> gmx.net
> From: Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
>  > OK, but why does it have to do that on the original value? It could
>  > do that on a copy that serves for the display and editing, in which
>  > case the original value could be left intact if the user didn't change
>  > it or did change, but didn't click Apply.  (If the user does modify
>  > the original value, then any conversions are okay, since the variable
>  > is really "edited".)
> 
> I think my description was inaccurate, because it seemed to imply that
> it is a destructive operation.  It is not, it leaves the original value
> intact.
> 
> But when deciding to set a state, Custom always consults the spec built
> from the data the face Widget has.

Can we change this last aspect, so that the state is set using the
original spec if the setting was not changed by the user?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 311 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.