GNU bug report logs - #64165
‘minibuffer-message’: naming/documentation bug

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>

Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:12:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>
Subject: bug#64165: closed (Re:  Re: bug#64165: ‘minibuffer-message’:
 naming/documentation bug)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:34:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#64165: ‘minibuffer-message’: naming/documentation bug

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 64165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
64165: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64165
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>
Cc: 64165-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 
 Re: bug#64165: ‘minibuffer-message’: naming/documentation bug
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:33:16 +0300
> From: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>
> CC: "64165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <64165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 17:43:04 +0000
> 
> I think if the documentation directly states: “message is shown in
> echo area when the current buffer is not minibuffe” (if indeed this is
> the case), it would clarify a lot.

Done on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.

Thanks.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>
To: "bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: ‘minibuffer-message’: naming/documentation bug
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:06:27 +0000
Both the name and docstring of ‘minibuffer-message’ say it uses
minibuffer instead of echo area, but is this really the case?

I enabled ‘global-display-fill-column-indicator-mode’ and want to
disable ‘dispaly-fill-column-indicator-mode’ only in minibuffer, so I
add a function that will turn off that mode to ‘minibuffer-mode-hook’
but it doesn’t work.  I find that if I switch to buffer
“ *Echo Area N*” then disable ‘display-fill-column-indicator-mode’,
the fill column indicator will disappear... So I guess there's a doc
bug.  (<https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/77668>)

--
shynur


This bug report was last modified 2 years and 27 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.