Subject: Re: 29.0.92; Provide additional details on GnuPG and EPA usage in epa.texi

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 08:54:06 +0300

> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 23:10:41 +0200
> From: Jens Schmidt <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> On 2023-06-18  19:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> Back from greener pastures, sorry for the delay.
> 
> >> +@node GnuPG Pinentry
> >> +@chapter GnuPG Pinentry
> > 
> > Pleased add an index entry for the subject of this chapter.  In 
> > general, it is a good idea to have an index entry for each 
> > chapter/section/subsection naming is main subject.
> 
> Problem here being that epa.texi has no concept index yet.  Should I
> create one from the existing chapters/sections/subsections in a separate
> patch?

Yes, please.  A manual that lacks Concept Index is not a good manual,
IMO.  In fact, Concept Index should be the very first index in a
manual; there are some good manuals which have only that and nothing
else.

> And the next question is: Does this ("new documentation of existing 
> features") qualify for Emacs 29?

Documentation improvements and fixes are always okay on the release
branch.  (But please hurry, since I plan on releasing Emacs 29.1 soon,
barring any grave bugs that will be uncovered.)

Thanks.