GNU bug report logs - #64151
[PATCH] etc: Stop making sendemail behave strangely.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 11:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 64151 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#64151] [PATCH] etc: Stop making sendemail behave strangely.
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:49:25 -0400
Hi Ludo,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Even with such a hypothetical --exclude-whomever switch added, I'd
>> argue that it is wrong to magically install this configuration without
>> any user interaction.
>
> Maybe that’s the main grief: that the new config was suddenly installed
> without fellow hackers realizing it (I, for one, wondered initially what
> magic made ‘git send-email’ Cc: all my friends :-)).
>
> Perhaps one way out is to suggest it in the manual without installing it
> automatically?  WDYT, Maxim?

I still think it has more value by being automatically installed, as
that way the pre-push hook that prevents unsigned commit is also
configured automatically, and new contributors would be likely to not
have it configured (by having missed it from the manual).

I see this similar to the .dir-locals.el file that automatically setups
(there's a prompt, but its design forces you into accepting it or being
repeatedly bothered ad aeternam).

If there are concrete issues with it, I think we should a) report them
and b) look into fixing them.

> (Independently of that, we’ll have to discuss patch review again.  We
> believed one problem was that potential reviewers wouldn’t notice
> patches in their area.  That’s arguably no longer the case, yet this
> hasn’t had any noticeable effect in terms of review activity.  How
> should we approach that?)

The teams are still nascent, and it's summer time.  I think we need to
give it some time and encourage more people to join or create new teams
and get familiar with the recently introduced/documented branch-based
updates :-).

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 322 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.