From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 13 12:58:55 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2010 16:58:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONqWN-00068v-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:58:55 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONqWL-00068p-Fe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:58:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:35792) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ONqWG-0005h5-Of for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:58:48 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36339 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONqWF-0008SD-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:58:48 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, PLING_QUERY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONqWE-00084a-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:58:47 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com ([209.85.211.187]:50012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONqWD-00084U-W8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:58:46 -0400 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so1343541ywh.1 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:58:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+0DKyoQnnMO2KPhqU0/TezyZUZdX22tFZocsAfbLj1w=; b=UgY54XTUA9dei9fmnAysf66mYC5R2I45BUfHGRdxe+uIvcwXWOwgpjd/r136er1mpv tWNIKibiWqEIH+15davCfAP1vxENI1BzSCdA32Lyl2iA5kUK7i9gPHGF6v4NWpuJuRFT zvVwakpq+GskEaH9uxsozPQB8e2l3Uc2LF/hY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=ecjcI8jQgr3bvlKs0VULH8BlTtAzIJbHRUVpwHnpY4wtKyaDXY0+UqFStCorjU0ZgA 6AzUYwRCT+2Tsi1ciDZHBHKd5lsC1T1iet79sTQRuDRcUw+qwCySK7WNgXpJAYsZAJhR lHlWnOuImGGBFyTmtukTmemNdD6Lqehe9j2UI= Received: by 10.101.205.6 with SMTP id h6mr3969866anq.179.1276448325093; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:58:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:58:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:58:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) I just got this from the gdb running Emacs: Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. [Switching to Thread 372.0xcec] 0x7c90120f in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll (gdb) bt #0 0x7c90120f in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll #1 0x7c951e40 in ntdll!KiIntSystemCall () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll #2 0x00000005 in ?? () #3 0x00000004 in ?? () #4 0x00000001 in ?? () #5 0x215affd0 in ?? () #6 0x00000000 in ?? () (gdb) c Is there anything I can do to look into it further? I can't think of anything I did in Emacs this time that triggered this so I am a bit lost. As I previously mentioned I have added a macro to test system calls return values and I wonder if this somehow is involved here or if this is just one of these "doctor watson-crashes" I now and then see, as seen through gdb. The macro I added just looks like #define W32ASSERT(TEST, WHERE) if (!TEST) DebPrint (("%s: %s\n", WHERE, w32_strerror(0))) In the code I write this as something like W32ASSERT (0, "w32_SetWindowPos_from_main_thread.PostMessage"); or with 0 replaced by a variable. This does not look problematic too me, but I wonder if DepPrint can be called anywhere. Is there some problem calling it inside a BLOCK_INPUT .. UNBLOCK_INPUT? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 13 14:11:01 2010 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2010 18:11:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONre9-0006ga-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:11:01 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONre6-0006gV-Ku for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:10:59 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3Y00000T4OSD00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:10:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.88.125]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3Y00IU6T5KVZA0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:10:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:10:34 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Lennart Borgman Message-id: <834oh6kdlx.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:58:25 +0200 > Cc: > > I just got this from the gdb running Emacs: > > Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. > [Switching to Thread 372.0xcec] > 0x7c90120f in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll > (gdb) bt > #0 0x7c90120f in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () > from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll > #1 0x7c951e40 in ntdll!KiIntSystemCall () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll > #2 0x00000005 in ?? () > #3 0x00000004 in ?? () > #4 0x00000001 in ?? () > #5 0x215affd0 in ?? () > #6 0x00000000 in ?? () > (gdb) c > > Is there anything I can do to look into it further? Try "info threads". I'm guessing you will see a couple more threads, in which case switch to each one of them and type "bt" to see their call-stack. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 14:50:33 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 18:50:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdRkW-0003pG-S5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:50:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com ([74.125.83.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdRkU-0003p4-Bh for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:50:31 -0400 Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so4278722pvh.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:50:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Du4hRrXgtW83sbhLqIcw2t3V/7RjqP9WIQMpRuI7bYU=; b=nffGTkF200PKN9ITlzcIB2BI4nr/9Wi56Zsi+wUQ4oV0ObH1K+2wPKu/rlUe3x/2gG lmlKP9VNX4gAQfjgWAxK4El4/3zOZdTBfSU94OxkFjQhU899cOdeThqcqAxibh3M3+Os Z/qBV8vFqVHW4QyFok+d4Dj21ZiGHM/2HZV50= Received: by 10.142.144.11 with SMTP id r11mr2559044wfd.335.1309719024089; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:50:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.48.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 11:49:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:49:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 18:58, Lennart Borgman wrote: > Is there anything I can do to look into it further? I can't think of > anything I did in Emacs this time that triggered this so I am a bit > lost. Is this bug repeatable, or can we close it? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 18:39:48 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 22:39:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVKO-0004jp-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:39:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVKM-0004jb-1k for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:39:46 -0400 Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so1919446eye.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:39:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2PLCoPcjCTGBu1A4Q+8dYUBR47rAEVTJXCZl0Q8I+CU=; b=sEP7yC+8Bk1Ukjh8OvQAQu/mta8QxsXkNiDFQHdLRnQOb1+xCQutMHjBrBNJVbILUb yj7x81GczR0jmBNDLV9E9W60/58OhhwaMvALEBUuQ5/sPEkGrh0KuVraeNWoodE8emvb os4iMB1gPHhjX89AqTb0VRLqKhjn5CVIw5VHw= Received: by 10.213.20.200 with SMTP id g8mr1646258ebb.140.1309732780352; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:39:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.7.84 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:39:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 00:39:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 20:49, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 18:58, Lennart Borgman > wrote: > >> Is there anything I can do to look into it further? I can't think of >> anything I did in Emacs this time that triggered this so I am a bit >> lost. > > Is this bug repeatable, or can we close it? I saw some more of this, but at the moment I have no setup to repeat it. You might look at the macro. I would be glad for some comments on it since I rarely right code like that. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 18:55:06 2011 Received: (at 6413-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 22:55:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVZB-00056J-QH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:55:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com ([74.125.83.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVZA-00055p-Cr for 6413-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:55:04 -0400 Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so4376470pvh.3 for <6413-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:54:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6v/7dXwGtUUq7FonSa1sY+x6r11pX1DbLs7AlFomsC4=; b=hfBigLZoamS1/kVSfmc8Auk9i4jI17jBjRfSun/U9KhgP96fAJOv6lT5S0o+vMfEZW 4IXOqpCN/Ket3BW046ySZgmmixXL5EYyxOaOmtwqq/AvydmAkPPbrKfeYT9YQJbGsdLw vz0CbvPc1xzwR8aMBvhQd9Z6Rg8CVmoLYSonE= Received: by 10.143.43.15 with SMTP id v15mr2520984wfj.164.1309733698291; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:54:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.48.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 00:54:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413-done Cc: 6413-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 00:39, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > I saw some more of this, but at the moment I have no setup to repeat it. You also didn't follow Eli's suggestion to try to show backtraces from other threads, or you didn't report it. I'm closing this bug. Please reopen it if you have additional info. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 18:59:43 2011 Received: (at 6413-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 22:59:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVdf-0005Cz-EK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:59:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVdd-0005Cn-R5 for 6413-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:59:42 -0400 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1930955ewy.3 for <6413-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:59:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=omTK8rWQ+IefzHHnWX486qCUcIvP81l8uSOvmaK9KqE=; b=F9eNOcoqY6YEj+Ov4qznRDsCVndVU6y+vM44J4rcpi8P8xTgQ6qlYK4vndfINGQplW UlNRqyAt0MRHUMp9mfc0h5cYF0he4pLW5dz/3wLwYVLdxICra5FMaw1tqxi/9zXTxOwt 16qLrEY2T5f0g4+pq3NmSF0ioQhjnTcNXhAzo= Received: by 10.213.20.200 with SMTP id g8mr1649000ebb.140.1309733976178; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:59:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.7.84 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:59:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 00:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413-done Cc: 6413-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 00:54, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 00:39, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> I saw some more of this, but at the moment I have no setup to repeat it. > > You also didn't follow Eli's suggestion to try to show backtraces from > other threads, or you didn't report it. I did not have a chance. It might be that I have fixed this in my patched version where I did the change I suggested. > I'm closing this bug. Please reopen it if you have additional info. You may consider the above information additional info. (But there might be some bogus things in my macro that actual is involved.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 19:06:07 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 23:06:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVjr-0006Bc-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:06:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVjq-0006B2-17 for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:06:06 -0400 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so127621pzk.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=piDZu7nekdkU3ZuuhYnWauv7TpLPYXRF3rpenYhsCLU=; b=XQdqnyuDNh0+8brLAOtFYj3bDoEkkgczr9xnp2E0eV1oWpf+rIT90o/bWR/0UF3CND Kz6JG56MvHZxv5R9eabOkXfsihAcnDtkw9CiIn/lrFDLbJj8chmsfmmatnRoi8EkXWQM ls9TuEva4LeO4UVYqQoVhccno3mFhaf3qSZi4= Received: by 10.143.43.15 with SMTP id v15mr2524719wfj.164.1309734360142; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:06:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.48.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:05:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:05:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 00:59, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > You may consider the above information additional info. No, additional info is something that helps to track or fix a bug, and I still haven't seen any bug in this report. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 19:19:54 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 23:19:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVxC-0006V4-Ka for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:19:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdVxA-0006Uq-E9 for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:19:52 -0400 Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so1925043eye.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ADihTXnxyUJuQ5wo+LRgZCOZ1DzzeuI+jBUiVS4JxbQ=; b=JfQct5Xno9onUgr+tem/L/vBgBe+SwlRZBwisL6DvEjSWIJlPueNmPKHkdRhM2SiVP vGkTmTwORSo0Vu2WvFTLMXOeUxZz4Deu0jJBhApGfUoCT5cRF+c7mK0sZ1TsKpqJ+Qk0 g/VHVMp+3peyUesbX3kdqQXNwuxLlvONuvHVU= Received: by 10.213.114.66 with SMTP id d2mr1579166ebq.102.1309735186806; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.7.84 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:19:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:19:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 01:05, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 00:59, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> You may consider the above information additional info. > > No, additional info is something that helps to track or fix a bug, and > I still haven't seen any bug in this report. Hm, that was what I gave above. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 19:30:37 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 23:30:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdW7Y-0007Ll-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:30:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdW7W-00079Q-8l for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:30:34 -0400 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so137757pzk.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DpOza3G+4ZgI7V8AzqUkKolB/QG4Vl0oEDr0pTPcoY0=; b=tDKFR4WRHRjk8HYJCY3/0vv6H3HnK7EadnFOE9oEBa1981NARnVzsIJnt+VtQLyR8V EZklI+8CROeWQnMdz8sZ7jKu+vPqBQC+smYKRPYlPjDVOyPio+U3zLKGWICm7OfnAHSn i7nqH2aGEPo37D3EAEwMN3ZiZZg7d0Khn7sYU= Received: by 10.142.118.24 with SMTP id q24mr2484642wfc.392.1309735828167; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:30:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.48.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:29:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 01:19, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > Hm, that was what I gave above. Sorry, you're right, this bug report is really about a bug, or at least a crash. I was mixing bug reports :-) But still, you have said: "It might be that I have fixed this in my patched version where I did the change I suggested." The only change you've suggested in this thread is adding a debug macro. If that really changed things, that would mean that memory is getting overwritten or some such thing, and without additional information there's not much to be done. I think you run Emacs under GDB. If so, when such a crash happens please don't exit GDB after reporting the bug. Leave it open so someone knowledgeable can ask you about it. Thanks, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 19:45:01 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 23:45:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdWLU-0007wo-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:45:01 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdWLS-0007wa-Pr for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:44:59 -0400 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1937148ewy.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:44:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=m8GOoxGaqzF+vjgbuW+6Q/oPUvMbQOuVihvvijJQyhQ=; b=PgzfAVUjbRvW0V1tvC5FIKgL/wQNDHcs4WbiDlXQ4bYuQYzZxEwIekG6M8krLQUz1Z 98TBJqgsyl3ElMGjF8ciafIVTtJAfrsPZw60+v3SkZulVqUYLyujywbTkeSRzTQN+ScC cFmgTE3lzzRX2zZg1L2TlSPuoHWuN1+zv1aMI= Received: by 10.213.114.66 with SMTP id d2mr1582534ebq.102.1309736693103; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:44:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.7.84 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:44:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 01:29, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 01:19, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> Hm, that was what I gave above. > > Sorry, you're right, this bug report is really about a bug, or at > least a crash. I was mixing bug reports :-) That is common when you try to fix a lot of things ;-) > But still, you have said: "It might be that I have fixed this in my > patched version where I did the change I suggested." > > The only change you've suggested in this thread is adding a debug > macro. If that really changed things, that would mean that memory is > getting overwritten or some such thing, and without additional > information there's not much to be done. > > I think you run Emacs under GDB. If so, when such a crash happens > please don't exit GDB after reporting the bug. Leave it open so > someone knowledgeable can ask you about it. I can't do that at the moment, but I will do it again when I have time to set it up. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 20:35:31 2011 Received: (at 6413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2011 00:35:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdX8N-0000bL-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:35:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdX8L-0000bA-Tg for 6413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:35:30 -0400 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so164900pzk.3 for <6413@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:35:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7CyGJbqGpgxYP1wzgwnodsiVK1QURipxATxNzPxd1YA=; b=syQwWyCcrY4zgcWxhzLZviMnMDTvM53HrUD7HRUWUCHWfuAE8nSRAqFrUcVpGziDjp PGo/IS+Neck2xcqmLcbQQT2ETyvL71UkYsPVFqJL2T38CEtqp+NQ5I1zPbnaiYcqNawo gV28ht9MnQlfNbKkzkXRuBrEabO2TWscMvUKY= Received: by 10.142.215.15 with SMTP id n15mr227737wfg.107.1309739724113; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:35:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.48.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 17:34:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 02:34:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6413: What does ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg mean? (on w32) To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6413 Cc: 6413@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 01:44, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > I can't do that at the moment, but I will do it again when I have time > to set it up. Thanks. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:51:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator