GNU bug report logs - #64077
30.0.50; Wrong definition of gamma function in calc.texi [PATCH]

Previous Next

Full log

Message #19 received at 64077 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> suse.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: lockywolf <at> gmail.com, 64077 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64077: 30.0.50; Wrong definition of gamma function in
 calc.texi [PATCH]
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:16:14 +0200

On Jun 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> I don't see how that follows.  Those look like function definitions to
> me, and they are not inside @kbd (which would indicate something the
> user should type into Calc).

Exactly, in algrebraic notion.  This is a TeX-like notation that uses
the literal characters ^ and _.

> So I don't think @sup is wrong there.

exp is a function, not a variable.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab <at> suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.