GNU bug report logs - #64077
30.0.50; Wrong definition of gamma function in calc.texi [PATCH]

Previous Next

Full log

Message #16 received at 64077 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> suse.de>
Cc: lockywolf <at> gmail.com, 64077 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64077: 30.0.50; Wrong definition of gamma function in
 calc.texi [PATCH]
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:01:25 +0300

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> suse.de>
> Cc: eliz <at> gnu.org,  lockywolf <at> gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:54:26 +0200
> 
> On Jun 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Thanks, fixed.  (But the corresponding @infoline needed to be fixed as
> > well, right?  So I did that.  And switched to using @sup there, to
> > produce a nicer HTML output.)
> 
> Using @sup{..} is wrong here, though.  The @infoline line is using calc
> algebraic syntax.

I don't see how that follows.  Those look like function definitions to
me, and they are not inside @kbd (which would indicate something the
user should type into Calc).

So I don't think @sup is wrong there.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.