GNU bug report logs - #64064
[PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#64064: closed ([PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements)
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 07:41:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:40:34 +0200
with message-id <87r0q7zyq5.fsf <at> gmx.de>
and subject line Re: bug#64064: [PATCH 3/4] Don't sort bugs in 'debbugs-gnu-show-reports'.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64064,
regarding [PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
64064: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64064
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:15:57 -0400

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello!

These patches enable the use of some more 'tabulated-list' functions
like 'tabulated-list-sort' (bound to "S").

You may or may not want to install the last patch.  It does add
potential network calls to the 'revert-buffer' function.  If there are
legitimate reasons to revert the buffer without fetching new bugs then
people might not like that change.

Morgan Smith (4):
  Call 'tabulated-list-print-entry' in 'debbugs-gnu-print-entry'.
  Don't error out on 'nil' alist value.
  Don't sort bugs in 'debbugs-gnu-show-reports'.
  Add 'debbugs-gnu-rescan' to 'tabulated-list-revert-hook'.

 debbugs-gnu.el | 62 +++++++++-----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
 

[0001-Call-tabulated-list-print-entry-in-debbugs-gnu-print.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0002-Don-t-error-out-on-nil-alist-value.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0003-Don-t-sort-bugs-in-debbugs-gnu-show-reports.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0004-Add-debbugs-gnu-rescan-to-tabulated-list-revert-hook.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 8 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>
Cc: 64064-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64064: [PATCH 3/4] Don't sort bugs in
 'debbugs-gnu-show-reports'.
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:40:34 +0200

Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com> writes:

Hi Morgan,

> To improve performance the next step should be making the network calls
> asynchronously.  I thought this was a free performance boost but it is
> not.  I have no plans to work on this.

We're doing asynchronous bug fetching already. In `debbugs-get-status',
several calls to `debbugs-soap-invoke-async' are fired in parallel,
every call retrieving up to `debbugs-max-hits-per-request' bugs at once.

I've also made some experiments with other improvements for asynchronous
network calls, those attempts failed (some years ago). And here we are.

Anyway, there's nothing left to do. I've released debbugs 0.36, closing
this bug.

> Thanks,
>
> Morgan

Best regards, Michael.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.