GNU bug report logs -
#64046
30.0.50; Quoting in customize choice tags
Previous Next
Reported by: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:04:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 30.0.50
Done: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #110 received at 64046 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 19:33:21 -0300 Mauro Aranda
<maurooaranda <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:29:47 -0300 Mauro Aranda
<maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:33:09 +0200 Ola x Nilsson
<ola.x.nilsson <at> axis.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that quote substition should be done on the car of
simple item
>>>>>> definitions. I have no opinion on susbstitute-command-keys vs
>>>>>> substitute-quotes. But I came to think about the TITLE argument,
>>>>>> shouldn't quote substition be performed on it as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you're right about that as well, since the title is simply a
>>>>> display feature. AFAIK it wouldn't make a noticeable difference for
>>>>> existing uses of widget-choose in the Customize UI (in the Value menu
>>>>> the title is simply "Choice" and in the State menu it's "Operation on
>>>>> <option name>"), but it might be relevant for third party uses or
future
>>>>> uses in Emacs, as well as for ad-hoc uses of simple item definitions.
>>>>> So applying substition to all uses of TITLE seems appropriate. The
>>>>> below patch does this, and also corrects my previous patch by
excluding
>>>>> substition from the cdr of simple item definitions.
>>>>
>>>> What would be a real-life scenario where we need to use
>>>> substitute-command-keys on TITLE? I can't think of any.
>>>
>>> I can't think of a really convincing example where it's needed, but
just
>>> as a possibility for stylistic variation, e.g. for simple item
>>> definitions one could have a more explicit prompt like this:
>>>
>>> (widget-choose "Type `0' or `1'" '(("Use `a'" . "Use `1'") ("Use `b'"
>>> . "Use `2'")))
>>>
>>> which would appear as "Type ‘0’ or ‘1’" with curve-style quotes. For
>>> the Customize UI, although the title is currently hard-coded as
>>> "Choice", one could define a widget with a title like "User's choice",
>>> which would appear as "User’s choice" with the curve-style quote.
>>> Unless some undesirable consequence of applying substitute-command-keys
>>> to TITLE is found, I don't see any harm in allowing such uses.
>>
>> I vote for don't adding code until it's really needed, and since there
>> isn't a real feature request for that, I'd leave it out.
>
> Well, I took Ola Nilsson's post which drew attention to the possibility
> of applying quote substition to TITLE (quoted above), as an implicit
> feature request, and found it plausible. But...
>
>> Looks like we
>> disagree on this, and it's not really my call, so let's leave it for a
>> maintainer to decide whether to add that line of code or not.
>
> ... I don't have any problem leaving TITLE alone for now. And I do
> agree with you that an Emacs maintainer should make the decision (also
> about whether to retain substitute-command-keys or instead use
> substitute-quotes).
Let's wait then. And thank you for taking the time to write the code
for it.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 313 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.