GNU bug report logs - #63956
29.0.91; tex-mode display problem in emacs-29

Previous Next

Full log

Message #67 received at 63956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 63956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, norden.jeff <at> gmail.com, sds <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#63956: 29.0.91; tex-mode display problem in emacs-29
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:12:56 +0300

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Jeff Norden <norden.jeff <at> gmail.com>,  sds <at> gnu.org,  63956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:34:19 -0400
> 
> Hmm... when I introduced `tex-cmd-doc-view` it just used
> 
>     (pop-to-buffer (find-file-noselect file))
> 
> then when Sam Steingold introduced `display-comint-buffer-action` (in
> commit 18b680cfd177) he used it there as well, but I suspect this was
> a mistake because that command does not at all work like a comint thingy
> (my guess is that he's an AUCTeX user and just assumed that
> `tex-cmd-doc-view` is like other `tex-cmd-*` thingies).
> 
> I'm not sure it's harmful to use `display-comint-buffer-action` or
> `display-tex-shell-buffer-action` there (e.g. I haven't noticed it being
> a problem in my own use since Sam's patch), but it doesn't seem
> necessary nor very natural (it's just not a "tex-shell" or "comint"
> buffer, it's a normal file buffer).

Thanks, I removed the 2nd argument of pop-to-buffer there.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.