GNU bug report logs -
#63949
30.0.50; `vc-print-log´ does not erase buffer when called from *vc-change-log* buffer, at least for CVS logs
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 2023-06-09 08:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> What do you mean by "modifies the VC parent buffer to itself"? Do
> you mean that vc-print-log makes the *vc-change-buffer* be the VC
> parent buffer? If so, why is this incorrect?
Hope below recipe explains it. The general idea is to start a VC
command first from the buffer of a VC-controlled file, then from the VC
result buffer, again from the VC result buffer, etc.
emacs -Q (from emacs-29)
<visit git-controlled file, say README>
;; current buffer equals README
C-x v l
;; current buffer equals *vc-change-log*
C-h v vc-parent-buffer
=> #<buffer README>
;; current buffer equals *vc-change-log*
C-x v l
C-h v vc-parent-buffer
=> #<buffer *vc-change-log*>
;; current buffer equals *vc-change-log*
C-x v l
;; git log of whole repository is displayed, not of README
I backed out commit d494833d47968fcd97ba549654a259d6fb6c2eee from
emacs-29 - both issues (the initial CVS-related one and the above one)
are gone after having done so.
Not all VC commands expose this problem. `vc-annotate' seems to work
and even the VC parent buffer stays unchanged when invoking
`vc-annotate' repeatedly. `vc-diff' gets the parent buffer wrong but
seems to work when invoked from buffer *vc-diff* repeatedly even if
parent buffer is wrong.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 312 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.