Subject: Re: [bug#63922] [PATCH] doc: fix typo in screen-locker-service swaylock example

From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 12:35:45 +0200

Arvid Krein <[email-masked]> writes:
> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index 8df5cc411c..638ab1ed6e 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -22577,7 +22577,7 @@ X Window
>  (service screen-locker-service-type
>           (screen-locker-configuration
>             (name "swaylock")
> -           (program (file-append xlockmore "/bin/xlock"))
> +           (program (file-append swaylock "/bin/swaylock"))
>             (using-pam? #t)
>             (using-setuid? #f)))
>  @end lisp

Thank you Arvid for your patch.  Thing is, it seems what is specified in
`program' actually does not matter, only the `name' field matters when
using-pam? is true.  I’m not going to work on this; perhaps someone
using screen lockers will decide what needs repairing.

Regards,
Florian