GNU bug report logs - #63840
29.0.91; c-ts-mode fails to fontify common C extension

Previous Next

Full log

Message #47 received at 63840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: luangruo <at> yahoo.com, 63840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, casouri <at> gmail.com,
 theo <at> thornhill.no
Subject: Re: bug#63840: 29.0.91; c-ts-mode fails to fontify common C extension
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 08:55:01 +0300

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 14:10:15 -0700
> Cc: luangruo <at> yahoo.com, 63840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, theo <at> thornhill.no
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:46:24 -0700
> >> Cc: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>,
> >>  Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>,
> >>  63840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >>
> >> > Would it be possible for you or someone else of the interested Emacs
> >> > users to submit a patch for the grammar library to support $, either
> >> > as an option or as an extension?  IOW, is it hard to modify the
> >> > TS grammar definitions for such relatively simple and straightforward
> >> > extensions?
> >>
> >> There is a PR for it on GitHub (under which I left a comment). Judging from the PR, it’s simple to add support for $.
> >
> > If so, perhaps just pinging about it from time to time is all that
> > should be done.
> 
> Does it make sense to keep this bug open on our side if we only intend
> to wait for upstream support?  Or should we close it as wontfix?

We could indeed close it.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.