Subject: Re: bug#63794:

From: Simon Tournier <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:02:15 +0200

Hi Chris,

On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 11:05, Christopher Baines <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Yep, clearing the guix-daemon's substitute cache should workaround these
> issues.

I think this report is about two issues:

 1. the substitute error,
 2. the way the error is reported.

About #1, clearing the cache seems fixing.

About #2, an error about the substitutes server should not trigger “hard
to parse” backtrace or misleading hint, IMHO.

Cheers,
simon