GNU bug report logs - #63731
[PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Steven Allen <steven <at> stebalien.com>

Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 03:19:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 63731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, steven <at> stebalien.com
Subject: bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 09:24:03 +0200

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 19:41:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
    >> Cc: 63731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  steven <at> stebalien.com
    >> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:20:08 +0200
    >> 
    Eli> Which forward rules would conflict with a backward rule triggered by
    Eli> U+FE0E?
    >> 
    Robert> All the ones for the non-emoji codepoints that still need to be
    Robert> composed as emoji sometimes, eg U+261D:
    >> 
    >> Oh, and all the <foo>+skin tone ones. And probably more.

    Eli> What do you mean by <foo>+skin?  Can you give a few examples?

Anything using 1F3FB..1F3FF, such as 1F44B 1F3FB or 1F3C4 1F3FB

Robert
--
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 350 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.