GNU bug report logs - #63731
[PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 63731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, steven <at> stebalien.com
Subject: bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:20:08 +0200

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 17:57:04 +0200, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> said:

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:35:37 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
    >>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
    >>> Cc: 63731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  steven <at> stebalien.com
    >>> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:27:28 +0200
    >>> 
    Eli> Hmm... I though just changing the fontset in fontset.el would be
    Eli> enough.
    >>> 
    >>> Itʼs almost enough to do that, and to check if the triggering
    >>> character is U+FE0E, bu then we fall foul of the composition rule
    >>> forward/backward issue again.

    Eli> Which forward rules would conflict with a backward rule triggered by
    Eli> U+FE0E?

    Robert> All the ones for the non-emoji codepoints that still need to be
    Robert> composed as emoji sometimes, eg U+261D:

Oh, and all the <foo>+skin tone ones. And probably more.

Robert
-- 

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.