GNU bug report logs - #63726
time-machine without options does not get the latest commit

Previous Next

Full log

Message #41 received at 63726 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>
Cc: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen <at> fastmail.net>, 63726 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#63726: time-machine without options does not get the latest
 commit
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:39:55 -0400

Hi Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Hey!
>>>
>>> Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen <at> fastmail.net> skribis:
>>>
>>>> This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with
>>>> time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit channel
>>>> file every time.
>>>
>>> Yeah.  The use case I have in mind is something like:
>>>
>>>   guix time-machine -q --commit=XYZ -- build hello
>>>
>>> Useful, for example, to share a way to reproduce a bug, making sure
>>> there’s nothing but the ‘guix’ channel.
>>
>> The '-q' short option by itself is a bit opaque / hard to memorize;
>> perhaps complementing it with a self explanatory
>> '--ignore-channel-files' long option name would be a good idea?
>
> Yes, I did that in v2, as Simon suggested.

Oh, I had missed that.  Thank you!

> (‘-q’ seems to be a relatively common convention: emacs, guile, and also
> ‘guix repl’.)

I think it's also commonly used as '--quiet', in other circles :-).

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.