GNU bug report logs -
#63648
29.0.90; project.el: with switch-use-entire-map, switch-project errors on non-project commands
Previous Next
Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:29:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.0.90
Done: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
>>> - Unfortunately, using default-directory instead of the specialized
>>> variable which we added lately (project-current-directory-override)
>>> brings back the bug it was added for: https://debbugs.gnu.org/58784. The
>>> switch to a different design didn't fix the problem of the temporary
>>> binding for d-d in the buffer which is current when the command is
>>> executed. So adding the next-default-directory variable might not be the
>>> best idea after all. But the advice thingy can set a binding for any
>>> variable, including the *-override one.
>> I didn't test yet the cases from bug#58784. So this might require more
>> changes.
>
> We tried to make the default-directory binding work with a couple of
> different changes - it didn't work out.
The problem is that let-binding overrides the buffer-local value:
```
(let ((default-directory "/tmp/"))
(list default-directory
(buffer-local-value 'default-directory (current-buffer))))
=> ("/tmp/" "/tmp/")
```
Here is the shortest test case: 'C-x p p C-b' shows buffers
from two projects when using let-binding for default-directory,
because 'project-buffers' relies on
(buffer-local-value 'default-directory buf)
This could be fixed by adding special-handling of the default-directory
for the current buffer in 'project-buffers'.
>>> - I also managed to get into some transient state where some chars were
>>> doing one thing (their usual bindings), and some - invoked project
>>> commands instead, with no apparent method of quitting that state. Maybe
>>> I'll document it next time I see it.
>> It would be nice to have a reproducible test case.
>> But indeed chars in the project map invoke the project commands,
>> and all other chars fall back to local/global keybindings.
>>
>>> - Using (project--keymap-prompt) for just a message call is cute, but
>>> I personally like the "guardrails": if I accidentally type a wrong char
>>> when choosing the command, I won't have to choose the other project
>>> again. This is debatable, but both modes of operation are probably worth
>>> keeping available (opinions welcome).
>> This is easy to do with something like in 'y-or-n-p-map'.
>
> With setting that (or similar) keymap as a transient keymap?
Something like this.
>>> - Either way, with method with the advice should be useful for other
>>> things, like project--other-place-command.
>> It's not recommended to use advice in the core packages,
>> maybe only for providing backward-compatibility with older versions.
>
> Sure, but it should also be permissible when there is no other way to do
> a thing.
>
> OTOH, if we're talking about new features in core, we could have
> a next-command-variables-alist, where we'd bind any variables that we would
> want.
Such generalization could be added later.
> A general question regarding this approach, for me, is: is a "prefix
> command" a real command?
It's a real command that prepares some transient values for the next command.
Most existing prefix commands have no problems because they modify global
values. But 'default-directory' is the first buffer-local variable
used for the next command, therefore it requires special-handling.
Too bad that 'default-directory' is not a function.
> And would they "swallow" these prepared variable bindings too early?
The scope of the modified variable depends on concrete needs.
For example, set-transient-map restores its old value in pre-command-hook,
but display-buffer-override-next-command does this in post-command-hook.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 200 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.