GNU bug report logs -
#63648
29.0.90; project.el: with switch-use-entire-map, switch-project errors on non-project commands
Previous Next
Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:29:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.0.90
Done: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
>>>> I suggest you bring up this feature addition on emacs-devel, or otherwise
>>>> wait for a review from Eli, at least.
>>>>
>>>> It's not a big addition, but it's a distinct new feature (the
>>>> next-default-directory var).
>>>
>>> Indeed, such code addition better to be discussed on emacs-devel.
>>
>> Did this end up being discussed on emacs-devel? I am still quite
>> interested in this feature.
>
> Oh, another thought (which maybe should be discussed on emacs-devel):
> maybe we don't need to make this specific next-default-directory var.
>
> Instead, maybe what we want is a way to bind a dynamic variable
> *without* changing the buffer-local value. It would shadow the existing
> binding, but if we explicitly switched buffer we'd get back to the old
> value. So we'd have:
>
> (special-let ((default-directory newval))
> (assert default-directory newval))
>
> and
>
> (special-let ((default-directory newval))
> (set-buffer (current-buffer))
> (assert default-directory oldval))
>
> Ignore any complexities of implementing this and any complexities of the
> semantics which I haven't covered. If we had this, would it work as an
> alternative to next-default-directory?
There is no code where to bind a dynamic variable, because its value
should be available for the next command in the command loop.
If you agree there is no other way to implement this than next-default-directory,
then I could bring up the discussion on emacs-devel.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 200 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.