GNU bug report logs -
#6361
24.0.50; Bug in vc-dir status update for SVN 1.5.x
Previous Next
Reported by: rogers-emacs <at> rgrjr.dyndns.org
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:41:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Found in version 24.0.50
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#6361: 24.0.50; Bug in vc-dir status update for SVN 1.5.x
which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 6361 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
6361: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6361
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Thanks; applied.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Subversion 1.6 changed the output of "svn status -r" to include an
extra column. The following change (according to git):
Author: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>
Date: Thu Dec 10 14:24:42 2009 +0000
(vc-svn-after-dir-status): Fix regexp. (Bug#4741)
accommodates this extra column at the expense of breaking Subversion
1.5; files that require update are skipped entirely by
vc-svn-after-dir-status. Could we please make the following tweak so
that it also works for older versions? (Since Subversion 1.6 is barely
15 months old, I assume it was not Dan's intent to drop compatibility.)
And since this change has been around for a while, I assume this is
also broken in 23.2 . . .
TIA,
-- Bob Rogers
http://www.rgrjr.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/lisp/vc-svn.el b/lisp/vc-svn.el
index cd43d42..889a60c 100644
--- a/lisp/vc-svn.el
+++ b/lisp/vc-svn.el
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ want to force an empty list of arguments, use t."
(?? . unregistered)
;; This is what vc-svn-parse-status does.
(?~ . edited)))
- (re (if remote "^\\(.\\)...... \\([ *]\\) +\\(?:[-0-9]+\\)? \\(.*\\)$"
+ (re (if remote "^\\(.\\)......? \\([ *]\\) +\\(?:[-0-9]+\\)? \\(.*\\)$"
;; Subexp 2 is a dummy in this case, so the numbers match.
"^\\(.\\)....\\(.\\) \\(.*\\)$"))
result)
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 350 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.