GNU bug report logs -
#63586
29.x: dotimes (possible) problem
Previous Next
Reported by: balducci <at> units.it
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 15:12:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 63588
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #11 received at 63586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: balducci <at> units.it
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 17:10:44 +0200
>
> the dotimes macro behaves differently in 29.x with respect to previous
> versions
>
> Basically: changing the value of the loop variable in the body of
> dotimes does not seem to have any effect, where for versions <29.x it
> used to.
>
> Here is a minimal stretch of dummy code clarifying the problem I'm
> reporting.
>
> emacs-29.0.91 (or 29.0.90)
> ==========================
>
> (dotimes (ii 10)
> (insert (format "%2d " ii))
> (when (= ii 4)(setq ii 11))
> )
> ==> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
>
> emacs-28.2 (or any version <29.x)
> =================================
>
> (dotimes (ii 10)
> (insert (format "%2d " ii))
> (when (= ii 4)(setq ii 11))
> )
> ==> 0 1 2 3 4
I can only reproduce the behavior you see in 28.2 in Emacs 26.3. All
the later versions, starting from 27.1, behave like Emacs 29 does.
> The ability to jump out of the loop by pushing the loop variable over
> the upper limit is something that I happen to use in my scripts, so
> 29.x breaks them somehow
>
> Of course, there are very many other equivalent ways to
> accomplish the same result, but I don't see why this one
> shouldn't be supported (any longer)
>
> Is the changed behavior intentional? Am I missing some blatant point here?
>
> AFAICS, changing the value of the loop variable from inside the loop
> body is supported by any other language which I know about
Adding Stefan and Mattias who made changes in dotimes recently.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 254 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.