GNU bug report logs - #63583
gnu: bitcoin-core: Update to 24.1.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 12:31:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 63583 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#63583] gnu: bitcoin-core: Update to 24.1.
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:52:12 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> On ven., 19 mai 2023 at 13:30, Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -(define-public bitcoin-core-23.1
>> +(define-public bitcoin-core-24.1
>
> [...]
>
>> -    (version "23.1")
>> +    (version "24.1")
>
> [...]
>
>> -                "03k56vgk0a0wr84gpj256hvijk6iyshl85hcrx800hiznyzl5hkl"))))
>> +                "0kmgpzknbykgwb8vd7hj3j1xxn35785gf4vii5705k6rnarks2la"))))
>
> [...]
>
>> -(define-public bitcoin-core bitcoin-core-23.1)
>> +(define-public bitcoin-core bitcoin-core-24.1)
>
> Out of curiosity, why are these two symbols required?  Maybe, it could
> be nice to drop ’bitcoin-core-xy.z’ and keep only ’bitcoin-core’, no?
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers,
> simon

Hi.
IIRC, at some point in the past we had two versions of bitcoin-core, and
the 'bitcoin-core' variable was pointing at one of the packages. Then
one of the versions became outdated and was removed.
Since we now have only one version, removing the leftovers from the
multiple package version support stuff seems like a good idea...
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.