From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 05 11:19:14 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2010 15:19:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKv9W-0003xu-4I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:19:14 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKv9S-0003xp-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:19:11 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:45621) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OKv9O-0001NQ-2g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:19:06 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33887 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKv9M-0004WI-Of for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:19:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKv9L-0001YD-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:19:04 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:55553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKv9L-0001Y2-Dq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:19:03 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o55FJ0so020822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:19:01 GMT Received: from acsmt354.oracle.com (acsmt354.oracle.com [141.146.40.154]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o55FJ04n021129 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:19:00 GMT Received: from abhmt018.oracle.com by acsmt355.oracle.com with ESMTP id 324103331275751050; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:17:30 -0700 Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.64.41) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:17:30 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.0.50; sit-for 0.0 returns nil without user input Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 08:17:39 -0700 Message-ID: <96D9702388274489BC359D8CD6629D00@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcsEwjxkwucntcebSlayBURpzRjN0w== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-Source-IP: rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4C0A6AE6.0014:SCFMA4539811,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) I see this problem systematically starting with Emacs 22 but never with Emacs 20 or 21. If the sit-for value is 0.0, then it can return nil even without user input. If the value is ever so slightly more than 0.0, e.g. 0.001, then there is no problem. This is using source code, not byte-compiled code, so it's not a byte-compiler optimization that is causing the problem. I do not have an emacs -Q recipe. If you just eval (sit-for 0.0) it returns t. Executing some of the surrounding code I use also does not reproduce the problem. But in my setup (too much to reproduce) it always returns nil for 0.0. Dunno if maybe it's picking up some non-user event as if it were input. I do know that without user input the return value is nil (in my context). In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-05-23 on G41R2F1 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 01 04:08:55 2014 Received: (at 6355) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2014 09:08:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43936 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9WZK-0003Qu-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:08:54 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9WZG-0003Ql-Ox for 6355@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:08:51 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W9WZ2-0003KQ-31; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:08:36 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#6355: 24.0.50; sit-for 0.0 returns nil without user input References: <96D9702388274489BC359D8CD6629D00@us.oracle.com> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 01:07:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <96D9702388274489BC359D8CD6629D00@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 5 Jun 2010 08:17:39 -0700") Message-ID: <87txcjkxpb.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1W9WZ2-0003KQ-31 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1391850517.00933@sI0qHhdKpDPSf20K7E73dw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6355 Cc: 6355@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) "Drew Adams" writes: > I do not have an emacs -Q recipe. If you just eval (sit-for 0.0) it > returns t. Executing some of the surrounding code I use also does not > reproduce the problem. But in my setup (too much to reproduce) it > always returns nil for 0.0. > > Dunno if maybe it's picking up some non-user event as if it were input. > I do know that without user input the return value is nil (in my > context). Is this still a problem? I'm unable to reproduce it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 01 04:09:00 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2014 09:09:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9WZQ-0003RG-5J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:09:00 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58991) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9WZN-0003R4-Lw for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:08:58 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W9WZ7-0003KZ-LT for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:08:42 +0100 Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 01:07:49 -0800 Message-Id: <87sis3kxp6.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6355 X-MailScanner-ID: 1W9WZ7-0003KZ-LT X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1391850524.62993@l1sWOzrv5dEfOTVkHWRb1w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) tags 6355 unreproducible From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 18:05:38 2015 Received: (at 6355) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2015 23:05:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbQU-0004oc-TI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:05:38 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbQQ-0004oE-9G for 6355@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:05:33 -0500 Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbQ0-0006FH-RX; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:05:04 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#6355: 24.0.50; sit-for 0.0 returns nil without user input References: <96D9702388274489BC359D8CD6629D00@us.oracle.com> <87txcjkxpb.fsf@building.gnus.org> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:05:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87txcjkxpb.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 01 Feb 2014 01:07:44 -0800") Message-ID: <87y4ciruxr.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCbQ0-0006FH-RX X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451689505.04294@WAi5P9rP1V7LQWZpEzmn5g X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6355 Cc: 6355@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > "Drew Adams" writes: > >> I do not have an emacs -Q recipe. If you just eval (sit-for 0.0) it >> returns t. Executing some of the surrounding code I use also does not >> reproduce the problem. But in my setup (too much to reproduce) it >> always returns nil for 0.0. >> >> Dunno if maybe it's picking up some non-user event as if it were input. >> I do know that without user input the return value is nil (in my >> context). > > Is this still a problem? I'm unable to reproduce it. More information was requested, but no response was given within a few months, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please reopen this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 18:05:32 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2015 23:05:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbQS-0004oO-Md for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:05:32 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbQR-0004oG-4n for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:05:31 -0500 Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbQ3-0006FP-U6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:05:08 +0100 Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:05:07 +0100 Message-Id: <87wps2ruxo.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6355 X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCbQ3-0006FP-U6 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451689508.23489@hDHTV1g7LjwPsjVdoYL1HA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) close 6355 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 18:12:43 2015 Received: (at 6355) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2015 23:12:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbXO-00056R-To for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:12:43 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:46066) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbXN-00056E-Rw for 6355@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:12:42 -0500 Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id tBPNCYkW023052 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:12:35 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBPNCYOo016373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:12:34 GMT Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBPNCYUm026234; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:12:34 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6ec152b9-46bc-4101-bbbd-9a2ce7a99a0e@default> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:12:35 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: RE: bug#6355: 24.0.50; sit-for 0.0 returns nil without user input References: <96D9702388274489BC359D8CD6629D00@us.oracle.com> <87txcjkxpb.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87y4ciruxr.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87y4ciruxr.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6355 Cc: 6355@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) > More information was requested, but no response was given within a few > months, so I'm closing this bug report. Yes, it was requested _4 years_ after it was reported, in 2010. (And the bug report already made clear that no more info was available.) From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:10:10 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator