GNU bug report logs -
#63535
Master branch: Error in forw_comment (syntax.c) handling of escaped LFs
Previous Next
Reported by: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:58:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #37 received at 63535-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello, Stefan.
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:16:40 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I think the following patch is better. Would you please have a look at
> > it, in the hope I haven't made any other silly mistakes. Thanks!
> I don't see any silly mistake there, sorry.
Thanks! I've committed the patch, and I'm closing the bug.
> Stefan
> PS: It does remind me that we really should do ourselves a favor and get rid
> of the distinction between `Sescape` and `Scharquote`.
> IIRC there's a risk of backward incompatibility, so it has to be done
> progressively, but we should start the process. E.g. first declare one of the
> two as obsolete, then emit a warning when we see it being used, ...
Yes. I think Sescape should be the survivor. I don't know if
Scharquote is used at all in Emacs code.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 83 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.