GNU bug report logs - #63535
Master branch: Error in forw_comment (syntax.c) handling of escaped LFs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>

Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #37 received at 63535-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: acm <at> muc.de, 63535-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#63535: Master branch: Error in forw_comment (syntax.c)
 handling of escaped LFs
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:16:49 +0000
Hello, Stefan.

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:16:40 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I think the following patch is better.  Would you please have a look at
> > it, in the hope I haven't made any other silly mistakes.  Thanks!

> I don't see any silly mistake there, sorry.

Thanks!  I've committed the patch, and I'm closing the bug.

>         Stefan


> PS: It does remind me that we really should do ourselves a favor and get rid
> of the distinction between `Sescape` and `Scharquote`.
> IIRC there's a risk of backward incompatibility, so it has to be done
> progressively, but we should start the process.  E.g. first declare one of the
> two as obsolete, then emit a warning when we see it being used, ...

Yes.  I think Sescape should be the survivor.  I don't know if
Scharquote is used at all in Emacs code.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 83 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.