From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 15 18:13:34 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2023 22:13:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pygRi-0000Jx-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:34 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pygRf-0000Jo-Ol for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pygRf-0000zp-GT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:31 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pygRd-000691-Fz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C5D400ED for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HJ5IxTAFPbjP for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Gabriel Wicki To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Missing library in package procps Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87wn192qh8.fsf@erlikon.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.132.2.15; envelope-from=gabriel@erlikon.ch; helo=chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi Trying to upgrade a somewhat outdated system (from March 23) I noticed igt-gpu-tools failed to build. Investigating a bit the build fails due to some "proc/readproc.h" include missing. I think i managed to fix the failure in procps's Makefile, but testing the patched build results in a rather huge rebuild. `guix refresh -l procps` results in 5328 packages. Are there any other approaches one could take to a) fix the broken package without b) triggering a world-rebuild? I'm not sure if this is an upstream bug and whether other packages are affected, neither do I know whether the other header files that aren't being copied to the install dir should be. Thanks for your input in advance! I'll update this issue with a patch as soon as I manage to verify that my attempt actually works. gabber From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 15 18:37:57 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2023 22:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44690 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pygpJ-0000xW-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pygpG-0000xO-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pygpG-0007q8-BR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pygpE-0002iB-Ck for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:54 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QKvQP6zTkzDqP6; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1684190270; bh=L4Ot0X4LacL21hvHW7i47jtX9Jxxkw3FmrqBeatAhtE=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=COdioPbIGHrPwZYz7mcjHIg4uKl/y3jrwY7RdQGRL4RAp+c63epgHjzZ66RNvKa9e q3ZnQU1JXT0Ebv5uMyZB3e3Tz2v4NCq1Xh36mzGeHhMLpSKQIPC/pCslIwQUaYVx36 5u36ulwggzQdYGUy+srI7ewD3ULtdnu3HTxZ6xQg= X-Riseup-User-ID: D19FFE7F0764034B60883FF3C2BE175C2FF8BAFBB17B4D8AAEDA2C05F0BAF8C7 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QKvQP22sQzFqhs; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@erlikon.ch> From: Csepp To: Gabriel Wicki Subject: Re: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 00:36:37 +0200 In-reply-to: <87wn192qh8.fsf@erlikon.ch> Message-ID: <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 63530@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Gabriel Wicki writes: > Hi > > Trying to upgrade a somewhat outdated system (from March 23) I noticed > igt-gpu-tools failed to build. Investigating a bit the build fails due > to some "proc/readproc.h" include missing. I think i managed to fix the > failure in procps's Makefile, but testing the patched build results in a > rather huge rebuild. `guix refresh -l procps` results in 5328 > packages. Are there any other approaches one could take to a) fix the > broken package without b) triggering a world-rebuild? > > I'm not sure if this is an upstream bug and whether other packages are > affected, neither do I know whether the other header files that aren't > being copied to the install dir should be. > > > Thanks for your input in advance! I'll update this issue with a patch > as soon as I manage to verify that my attempt actually works. > > gabber You could test it as a graft, then dependents won't get rebuilt. If the public ABI exported by the package doesn't change, it Should Be Fine TM. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 16 04:06:11 2023 Received: (at 63530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2023 08:06:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pyphD-0000rA-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:06:11 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]:50529) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pyph8-0000qY-OL for 63530@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:06:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D4A400ED for <63530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id IU2qCUxDGoAn for <63530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <63530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Gabriel Wicki To: 63530@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@erlikon.ch> <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@riseup.net> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@riseup.net> (Csepp's message of "Tue, 16 May 2023 00:36:37 +0200") Message-ID: <87mt243dlp.fsf@erlikon.ch> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63530 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) A little more hacking leads me to the conclusion that (probably with version 4 but it's not exactly clear from the changelog) procps has made some significant changes to it's API. So, unless igt-gpu-tools (and probably others) are fixed upstream they remain broken. Fixes through simple regex-magic in our build-phases might be possible, but I am not confident enough in the matter to guarantee that the package would not just build but be broken in a more specific manner. Is there an easy way to check which dependents of procps are actually broken currently? Or is it really just igt-gpu-tools? There's two ways to go (I'd be happy for some input and volunteer to do the actual leg-work): 1. Add an additional procps-3 package with the older API to fix the broken packages. 2. Leave it as-is and wait for an upstream change of the currently broken packages. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 16 04:07:36 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2023 08:07:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pypia-0000tM-EP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:07:36 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]:47653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pypiY-0000t7-BV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:07:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BC9400ED for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:07:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AYqsrB5fybHI for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:07:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:07:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:07:27 +0200 Message-Id: <87leho3dj4.fsf@erlikon.ch> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Gabriel Wicki Subject: control message for bug #63530 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) retitle 63530 procps 4.0 upstream API change breaks packages quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 28 07:54:45 2023 Received: (at 63530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2023 11:54:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53397 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Eyy-0007gi-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:54:45 -0400 Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:40916) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Eyh-0007gI-1u for 63530@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:54:42 -0400 From: Jelle Licht DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsfe.org; s=2021100501; t=1685274865; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qj6OiSQk90fXA260q+fJJLAR552XZRkjH3MEeAOeWZk=; b=OrGryvhSFo9gqww4hUx5wGK+5Vg4gIFJilbmrotbldexJXBAXQ+TT2HDyFMIogaPE2+PNw hCMH8UXPUDzsQT7mG6N3KItx8dQ628hvtHXJ5/vKrFIPvRycfcUBApRiRvkJlAb5pV7bG7 svY5/+43LgEvPSOc4i40PqeBw3Ow5Ws= To: Gabriel Wicki , 63530@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps In-Reply-To: <87mt243dlp.fsf@erlikon.ch> References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@erlikon.ch> <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@riseup.net> <87mt243dlp.fsf@erlikon.ch> Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 13:54:24 +0200 Message-ID: <877cssd633.fsf@fsfe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63530 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Gabriel Wicki writes: > A little more hacking leads me to the conclusion that (probably with > version 4 but it's not exactly clear from the changelog) procps has made > some significant changes to it's API. So, unless igt-gpu-tools (and > probably others) are fixed upstream they remain broken. Fixes through > simple regex-magic in our build-phases might be possible, but I am not > confident enough in the matter to guarantee that the package would not > just build but be broken in a more specific manner. > > Is there an easy way to check which dependents of procps are actually > broken currently? Or is it really just igt-gpu-tools? > > There's two ways to go (I'd be happy for some input and volunteer to do > the actual leg-work): > 1. Add an additional procps-3 package with the older API to fix the > broken packages. > 2. Leave it as-is and wait for an upstream change of the currently > broken packages. I have found the upstream issue: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/-/issues/116 We can wait it out until the release, which will be out Soon (tm), or we make use of the patch that debian applies to igt-gpu-tools so it can work with the new libproc2 API: https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/app/intel-gpu-tools/-/blob/067ddd789fd80c12972fb92db8f93fadbdc4530e/debian/patches/libproc2_library AFAICS, this would not lead to a world-rebuild. Thoughts? - Jelle From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 28 11:25:22 2023 Received: (at 63530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2023 16:25:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r80tm-0002mc-9Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:25:22 -0500 Received: from cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.148.196]:56059) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r80th-0002mF-78 for 63530@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:25:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FE020ACD for <63530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:25:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.148.196]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id UBraJsuV7aJx for <63530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:25:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <63530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:25:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:24:57 +0100 From: Gabriel Wicki To: 63530@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Issue was fixed Message-ID: <2ebeflobzsr3iui3qwbedscqa3kzetjzijkmd4jsq2ddohioqb@bs66wigu7y3c> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This issue seems to have been fixed by Tobias with commit 22642d460488896ec1ddb25d7eb262938db810eb using a patch to work around the issue. I created a patch that'd upgrade to the next version where ig [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.0 URI_ONLY_MSGID_MALF URI only + malformed message ID 2.2 BODY_URI_ONLY Message body is only a URI in one line of text or for an image X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63530 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) This issue seems to have been fixed by Tobias with commit 22642d460488896ec1ddb25d7eb262938db810eb using a patch to work around the issue. I created a patch that'd upgrade to the next version where igt-gpu-tools is actually fixed (so the patch is not needed anymore): https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67508 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 28 12:36:18 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2023 17:36:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r820P-0004ql-VN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:36:18 -0500 Received: from cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.148.196]:35519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r820L-0004qM-Fr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:36:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCFF20ACD for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:35:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.148.196]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id fmHHppMYaKfu for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:35:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:35:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:35:55 +0100 From: Gabriel Wicki To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 63530 thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) close 63530 thanks From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator