GNU bug report logs - #63399
28.2; Documentation for yes-or-no-p wrong/different between docstring and lispref

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 63399 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Tim Landscheidt <tim <at> tim-landscheidt.de>
Cc: 63399 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#63399: 28.2;
 Documentation for yes-or-no-p wrong/different between docstring and
 lispref
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 16:48:31 +0300

> From: Tim Landscheidt <tim <at> tim-landscheidt.de>
> Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 20:35:20 +0000
> 
> The documentation for yes-or-no-p in Emacs 28.2 reads:
> 
> | yes-or-no-p is a built-in function in ‘C source code’.
> 
> | (yes-or-no-p PROMPT)
> 
> | Ask user a yes-or-no question.
> | Return t if answer is yes, and nil if the answer is no.
> 
> | PROMPT is the string to display to ask the question; ‘yes-or-no-p’
> | adds "(yes or no) " to it.  It does not need to end in space, but if
> | it does up to one space will be removed.
> 
> | […]
> 
> This is wrong: (yes-or-no-p "Prompt? ") gives the prompt
> "Prompt? (yes or no) ", but according to the docstring it
> should be "Prompt?(yes or no) ".

The doc string in Emacs 29 no longer includes the above confusing and
inaccurate text about removing the space.  So I think this
documentation bug was already fixed.

> Also, (elisp) Yes-or-No Queries reads (since 7f53446a10ea;
> doc/lispref/minibuf.texi):
> 
> | […]
> 
> |      Here is an example:
> 
> |           (yes-or-no-p "Do you really want to remove everything?")
> 
> |           ;; After evaluation of the preceding expression,
> |           ;;   the following prompt appears,
> |           ;;   with an empty minibuffer:
> 
> |           ---------- Buffer: minibuffer ----------
> |           Do you really want to remove everything? (yes or no)
> |           ---------- Buffer: minibuffer ----------
> 
> | […]
> 
> This is not the actual result: (yes-or-no-p "Do you really
> want to remove everything?") gives the prompt "Do you really
> want to remove everything?(yes or no) ", i. e., the space
> before the parenthesis is missing.

I've now fixed the example to be consistent with the result.

> Finally, the behaviour is different when using
> use-short-answers:
> 
> | (yes-or-no-p "Prompt?")
> 
> gives "Prompt?(yes or no) ", while:
> 
> | (let ((use-short-answers t)) (yes-or-no-p "Prompt?"))
> 
> gives "Prompt? (y or n) ".

You are supposed to include the trailing blank if you want to ensure
there's a blank between the prompt and the "(y or n)" part.

I think we should close this bug now.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.