GNU bug report logs - #63372
[PATCH] Add variable: eglot-apply-text-edits-function

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Felician Nemeth <felician.nemeth <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:30:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Full log


Message #14 received at 63372 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Felician Nemeth <felician.nemeth <at> gmail.com>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 63372 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#63372: [PATCH] Add variable: eglot-apply-text-edits-function
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 21:35:12 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com> writes:

>> >> 3. Eglot uses the eglot--apply-text-edits defun to apply server
>> >>    initiated edits.  There is an extension that allows the server to
>> >>    send the edits in a different format (snippet-text-edits).
>> >>
>> >>    Eglot-x puts an advise on eglot--apply-text-edits to check the format
>> >>    of the edits and act accordingly.
>> >>
>> >>    I don't know how to avoid this advice.
>> >
>> > Some hook or function variable, perhaps?  If they don't exist, perhaps
>> > they could be added?

> But then, I wonder, since most of Eglot's API is already CLOS
> based, isn't a generic function best?  A generic function can
> have :around methods, and if we follow the convention of
> passing the server as the first argument, third parties
> can make server-specific extensions.

You're right, I think.  In the attached patch, I simply changed
eglot--apply-text-edits to a cl-defgeneric and renamed it.  The patch is
straightforward, but I had to eliminate a cl-return-from call, because
generic functions don't seem to support that.

Thanks.

[0001-Eglot-Replace-eglot-apply-text-edits-with-a-public-f.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 123 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.