From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 04 12:29:57 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2023 16:29:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pubq9-0000zj-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 12:29:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pubq7-0000zZ-Dn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 12:29:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pubq7-0001F9-0c for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 12:29:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pubq5-0008Jx-3E for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 12:29:54 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-3f1f1a7ecb7so5024871cf.1 for ; Thu, 04 May 2023 09:29:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worcester-edu.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683217791; x=1685809791; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aM81ht5cz9geZ79taULxbtcuH4kSWTreZnmlm+njcwQ=; b=d9KmG2HwDAjJCis/U5xGRKS6xOxBGTsRLeYFtdXoAzHc6N+dOwFgi2tO7mZ6rSq52N DcFvS7pPIxFeRnZOYteq/VQBs8vA30/ccLLlf8SIrPohOsQrIsm5H/5Rc9Z6HfIZmS/K 77vHdn8i3QV0txGjzFqCYgk9mPqwKXYEPlvfpLjHhbMaEXa4sGpcwH1EiUfZVPIIHXD9 PL8pBOLbagg2gq8bC24OLtRGEyTb71xM/ZtMwQNwsEx6syq8G/22GpNkzfEmBOtjIw/C xv8cBwE4LyN3IxFd9lmII+GZTq1cvXx+vQmtsioQemZDoo9STJYkYJuSeFhWYJBkNvIO SQng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683217791; x=1685809791; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aM81ht5cz9geZ79taULxbtcuH4kSWTreZnmlm+njcwQ=; b=chRjIftMJ9kl1wE9K0svUTfCawpaOhpTSkD30UgjbzUUh4cy1TvbfLPE4SXtVNyXEq pCddW0vlnta9NLF+YD67pbPbYBVCdFzEkPXy5Qlz0Lphc8zsE4j4G8Qz7oJScWKCx2gD bg3u47+8Pj4ZzH1H5JzPwcZIMPIicoW8O2H4ra6lCjP2imrh9hiECFkRRpcJSsUZJ4ce tJQQRASjWPvw0LqXU9pN/e1nKm9+scfzHwJ6cX1TZd6NnTMUwutM5ThecyRW1G1O7qc2 f/OPm3raBuwOzSaQiWQUcWp5RGmlnMCT9HmcQM56D5iTXHoq+PK7IZlZZoL9gNVY4cu9 1dsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDy1YNgsZWkkxXN/VhdmbPVnZFtRjut2IL3Eem8DJJnKlxvJtT20 HrXhAwsCt4hdbGVAFy8CTYpIuZKHQ2spMiDVLcc0+VI/RMnttGzMiVg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5uDCcgZYzKO7tHMNRbHtIUs9Jnd7LZlwVQbigeNfp03UjpBo3ymqBuPqjLM6+BCYpQ9AxcklIMnQoILjS0Qss= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e0d:0:b0:3ef:6353:2c58 with SMTP id h13-20020ac85e0d000000b003ef63532c58mr6588033qtx.21.1683217791319; Thu, 04 May 2023 09:29:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Thompson, David" Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 12:29:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Segfault when printing a call-with-values stack frame in backtrace To: bug-guile@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::836; envelope-from=dthompson2@worcester.edu; helo=mail-qt1-x836.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello there, Guile seems to segfault when trying to print certain backtraces with a 'call-with-values' stack frame. Here's a minimal reproducer program: (symbol? (call-with-values (lambda () (error 'oh-no)) list)) If you eval this at the REPL and enter ,bt in the debugger, Guile should segfault. Relevant gdb backtrace: #0 0x00007ffff7f43397 in scm_is_values (x=0x0) at /tmp/guix-build-guile-3.0.9.drv-0/guile-3.0.9/libguile/values.h:30 #1 vm_regular_engine (thread=0x7ffff7401900) at /tmp/guix-build-guile-3.0.9.drv-0/guile-3.0.9/libguile/vm-engine.c:974 #2 0x00007ffff7f50db5 in scm_call_n (proc=, argv=, nargs=4) at /tmp/guix-build-guile-3.0.9.drv-0/guile-3.0.9/libguile/vm.c:1615 #3 0x00007ffff7ebb674 in scm_call_4 (proc=, arg1=, arg2=, arg3=, arg4=) at /tmp/guix-build-guile-3.0.9.drv-0/guile-3.0.9/libguile/eval.c:517 #4 0x00007ffff7eb801b in display_backtrace_body (a=0x7fffed68e6a0) at /tmp/guix-build-guile-3.0.9.drv-0/guile-3.0.9/libguile/backtrace.c:239 #5 0x00007ffff7f62092 in scm_c_with_exception_handler.constprop.0 (type=#t, handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x7fffed68e630, thunk_data=thunk_data@entry=0x7fffed68e630, thunk=, handler=) at /tmp/guix-build-guile-3.0.9.drv-0/guile-3.0.9/libguile/exceptions.c:170 >From what I can tell, in vm-engine.c, in the subr-call op, 'scm_apply_subr (sp, idx, FRAME_LOCALS_COUNT ())' is called and returns an SCM object, which is stored in the local variable 'ret'. Then 'scm_is_values (ret)' is called, and the segfault occurs due to a null pointer dereference. At the time of the segfault, 'idx' is 1130, corresponding to the 'frame-local-ref' subr. Makes sense since it's the backtrace printer that crashes Guile. It seems that the data stored in the stack frames for 'call-with-values' calls is incorrect and the backtrace printer wants to display 3 arguments for the call when the procedure only accepts 2 arguments. This can be clearly seen by running another small program that happens to not segfault: (call-with-values (lambda () (error 'oh-no)) list) Check out the backtrace and you'll see a frame like this: (_ #:8:18 ()> # 1) The first 2 arguments are as expected, but why is there a 1 at the end? For another example that doesn't crash but has an even more clearly messed up backtrace, try this: (append '(a b c) (call-with-values (lambda () (error 'oh-no)) list)) You'll see a frame like this: (_ #:10:35 ()> # . #) At Spritely we've reproduced this issue on multiple machines with both Guile 3.0.7 and 3.0.9. - Dave From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 07 11:06:54 2023 Received: (at 63279) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2023 15:06:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pvfyP-0008QJ-Vv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2023 11:06:54 -0400 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:41854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pvfyM-0008Q8-Uc for 63279@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2023 11:06:51 -0400 Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:5dba:d409:33f7:a16] ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:5dba:d409:33f7:a16]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id tr6p2900220ykKC01r6pY5; Sun, 07 May 2023 17:06:49 +0200 Message-ID: <13edc1f3-7dfa-81cc-43a3-75e60cf9bf54@telenet.be> Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 17:06:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1 Content-Language: en-US To: 63279@debbugs.gnu.org, "Thompson, David" From: Maxime Devos Subject: Re: Segfault when printing a call-with-values stack frame in backtrace Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------7PZbriWEYWJMD0XadNb0NFnd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r23; t=1683472009; bh=GoiENEOfT44mJZggRQYn6uD6yCcoUZaQTp3QG90f1CI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=IKmMjcVZkdhsdI6GubhHgbE+3wmQ7D25dYgfwQuOf3vpxyxY9sRAnAcfTqq+L/VBh DPdcN3Q6lWjJBREyZ70FRZSLy4oDtz1k0neKKu4T93SJ7n3d0fg4C8Cc/LRPBhCr3q /QceuNEBPu3WolSA0TVgrQJVJaJ4qD164DQ2GL1hrvzeJ6n0QOgnja7w0c++33pMT3 NWRWngwE4n3zyyT/9Pbyy60iPTWcSpnmYT5egTp17yDO2G3NnLz738307oupcGluJY vYsMirWSEyAw6RzrSbXF7Tab9CEynPOe+upvPy2RCIFC1CcyMpE9ewnb8KjbWNA44u R8NIs8KvDbArw== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63279 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------7PZbriWEYWJMD0XadNb0NFnd Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------093WIKA93EgB1F3q6NaCNnDs"; protected-headers="v1" From: Maxime Devos To: 63279@debbugs.gnu.org, "Thompson, David" Message-ID: <13edc1f3-7dfa-81cc-43a3-75e60cf9bf54@telenet.be> Subject: Re: Segfault when printing a call-with-values stack frame in backtrace --------------093WIKA93EgB1F3q6NaCNnDs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------DiX0H8KXTJEQ0Nk0e8QMOHhw" --------------DiX0H8KXTJEQ0Nk0e8QMOHhw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PiBIZWxsbyB0aGVyZSwNCj4gDQo+IEd1aWxlIHNlZW1zIHRvIHNlZ2ZhdWx0IHdoZW4gdHJ5 aW5nIHRvIHByaW50IGNlcnRhaW4gYmFja3RyYWNlcyB3aXRoIGENCj4gJ2NhbGwtd2l0aC12 YWx1ZXMnIHN0YWNrIGZyYW1lLiAgSGVyZSdzIGEgbWluaW1hbCByZXByb2R1Y2VyIHByb2dy YW06DQo+IA0KPiAoc3ltYm9sPyAoY2FsbC13aXRoLXZhbHVlcyAobGFtYmRhICgpIChlcnJv ciAnb2gtbm8pKSBsaXN0KSkNCg0KDQpIZXJlIGlzIGEgbW9yZSBtaW5pbWFsIHJlcHJvZHVj ZXIsIGZyb20NCjxodHRwczovL2RlYmJ1Z3MuZ251Lm9yZy9jZ2kvYnVncmVwb3J0LmNnaT9i dWc9NTAxNTM+Og0KDQo+IFdyaXRlIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgdG8gImNyYXNoLnNjbSI6DQo+ IA0KPj4gKGNhbGwtd2l0aC12YWx1ZXMgYmFja3RyYWNlIGxpc3QpDQo+PiAjdA0KPiANCj4g KHRoZSB0cmFpbGluZyAjdCBpcyBpbXBvcnRhbnQpIGFuZCBydW4NCj4gDQo+PiAjIC0tYXV0 by1jb21waWxlIHdvcmtzIHRvbywgYnV0IC0tbm8tYXV0by1jb21waWxlIGRvZXNuJ3QgY2F1 c2UgYSBjcmFzaA0KPj4gZ3VpbGUgLS1mcmVzaC1hdXRvLWNvbXBpbGUgLWwgY3Jhc2guc2Nt DQoNCihpLmUuLCBpdCBkb2Vzbid0IHNlZW0gdG8gYmUgYSBidWcgaW4gdGhlIGV4Y2VwdGlv biBtZWNoYW5pc20sIGl0c2VsZiANCnJhdGhlciBpdCBzZWVtcyBhIGJ1ZyBpbiBzb21ldGhp bmcgX3VzZWRfIGJ5IHRoZSBleGNlcHRpb24gbWVjaGFuaXNtLikNCg0KSSBkb24ndCBrbm93 IGlmIGl0IGhhcyBleGFjdGx5IHRoZSBzYW1lIGNhdXNlLCBidXQgaXQgbG9va3MgZmFtaWxp YXIuDQoNCkZvciBzb21lIG90aGVyIGJhY2t0cmFjZSBzdXNwaWNpb3VzbmVzcywgc2VlIA0K PGh0dHBzOi8vZGViYnVncy5nbnUub3JnL2NnaS9idWdyZXBvcnQuY2dpP2J1Zz00ODQyMj4s IHRob3VnaCBwb3NzaWJseSANCnRoYXQgaXNzdWUgaGFzIGEgZGlmZmVyZW50IGNhdXNlLg0K DQpCZWNhdXNlIG9mIHRoZSDigJhJdCBzZWVtcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBkYXRhIHN0b3JlZCBpbiB0 aGUgc3RhY2sgZnJhbWVzIGZvcg0KJ2NhbGwtd2l0aC12YWx1ZXMnIGNhbGxzIGlzIGluY29y cmVjdCBbLi4uXeKAmSBpdCBzZWVtcyBwbGF1c2libGUgDQpzb21ldGhpbmcgc2ltaWxhciBp cyBnb2luZyBvbiBpbiANCjxodHRwczovL2RlYmJ1Z3MuZ251Lm9yZy9jZ2kvYnVncmVwb3J0 LmNnaT9idWc9NDYyMzI+LCB0aG91Z2ggcG9zc2libHkgDQp0aGF0IGlzIHVucmVsYXRlZC4N Cg0KR3JlZWl0bmdzLA0KTWF4aW1lLg0K --------------DiX0H8KXTJEQ0Nk0e8QMOHhw Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP public key Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEX4ch6BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdANPb/d6MrGnGi5HyvODCkBUJPRjiFQcRU5V+m xvMaAa/NL01heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lLmRldm9zQHN0dWRlbnQua3VsZXV2 ZW4uYmU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCX4ch6AIbAwUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7japAQC3opZ2KGWzWmRc /gIWSu0AAcfMwyinFEEPa/QhUt2CogD/e2RdF4CYAgaRHJJmZ9WU7piKbLZ7llB4 LzgezVDHggzNJU1heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lZGV2b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZT7C kAQTFggAOBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJf56ycAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXujpQBAKV1SwDDl4f24rXciDlB9L8W ycZt30CgbewMSRQk4mvbAP9dFMbVVixYBd6C8cfhR+NsOBGiOJnQABlUmgNuqGFJ Dc44BF+HIegSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0BOlzIWiJzgobMF6/cqwLaLk7jIcFSZ++c0 k9cCNT6YXwMBCAfCeAQYFggAIBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJfhyHo AhsMAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXuMr0BAJc8cl5PGvVmVuSQVKjleNl4DK1/XAaPAYPe34AE fZJPAP9IqLCQhH/FeJanHqBP8gNdGNI2qn8RnnLVfRJgUjZ1BA=3D=3D =3DOVqp -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------DiX0H8KXTJEQ0Nk0e8QMOHhw-- --------------093WIKA93EgB1F3q6NaCNnDs-- --------------7PZbriWEYWJMD0XadNb0NFnd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCZFe+iAUDAAAAAAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7gr2 AQC/uFyKvKLjsRvGKrNNvCpZUeiL8rdXMWqZXML5lZtGcQD9F67xx0ZOK3fw7T+GvYX6dwj0hbHH D+ze4HYQZP8mFw0= =M8Rw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------7PZbriWEYWJMD0XadNb0NFnd-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 08 10:15:27 2023 Received: (at 63279-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2023 14:15:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pw1eB-0008Fs-DU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 10:15:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com ([209.85.222.174]:52459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pw1e5-0007hk-De for 63279-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 10:15:25 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-74e4f839ae4so224878585a.0 for <63279-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:15:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worcester-edu.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683555315; x=1686147315; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uP0RuFAlMay+CPqDREaA9udkYsk3Qwsh4l2Y2hbtp34=; b=oEZrNeV/gQugvhxO/1f52rkShbAw67ez/4L1geb0TDEBIQ0a0bst5rS2hy0codM9q/ gGlr+nWh6fFFSv4UoF3SniS8yH1jNBFDDFRomCc9o+AOUbg9mH4jBW3dBpYjCP/NQdCI KJJzipomDVXjDfolcGRPK1FCXrO0TSucIrH/mzvPK9q6MT0oTmyJwssl7oW9qaUSXhkW wQ9cd/cXXOvZ5bQ3jkE8RxzEqMCm18VBEDbO6d3wmcD+uMotG8QjxgutjdiqCPIg9thD w4bKvR3JCf3wXbrS4Su8im3hcwYUJgCLeO8einEqbofi8LD/KfHUtwv5pY36q0KfKIxX 5/Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683555315; x=1686147315; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uP0RuFAlMay+CPqDREaA9udkYsk3Qwsh4l2Y2hbtp34=; b=Gv1r4xvytyXEtiLZbdDeU0utPDMZRrnBLGLfbrE2vx6BN2yqbJkTe0CpJIRAz5p3+M 9jL2K59VR/iBYyP/rXwlRCfW7/dNnVp1by2MEFkKg19wys10/yR07hK+IEAcK+IKjJjP FgPjAF+Xq7cz93WSJqkSKUZ0tSf1meAc8ZtNoERYus0B53rDvp4nGxIfX8N+nvWuwm1i +iwD4A811/dxjjeFsr10ECBnmYMDfg6zKnSciV0NKaeeTEsg3ydtaezdHPx5CBh5BeFB oylLKpxI3WmFrS0lBHn7+Iy1suAPvWrAycsAQtFLnGKPqGOVslfXP5/LlJznGMJiC5zd k4MQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzVpyeFqmh27XRuKBAR08oBaZQi0r2ka4UZnwuNZihue1no9jhZ UxChm/bIUtu7CUl9sNSeTU0wChyJB4IyyRlKbj693Qkk3HYz9advTPY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6gmS+60zsX3HjC1kWwxSlm0D8jG5T8LupFean4wpyuEEqMrTKPIjByQbRBuN9sjtzR/uR8VVE7x/RvWJOPH84= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1703:b0:3f3:8ac9:997a with SMTP id h3-20020a05622a170300b003f38ac9997amr6734855qtk.59.1683555315251; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:15:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Thompson, David" Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 10:15:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Segfault when printing a call-with-values stack frame in backtrace To: 63279-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63279-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andy fixed this in commit 6efc0b8159f0fc74c0eafec988fe5434fb4d9f51. Thank you, Andy! Closing. - Dave From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator