GNU bug report logs - #63267
gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 14:53:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#63267: closed (gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:22:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:21:25 +0000
with message-id <8734rk36pb.fsf <at> protonmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#63267: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #63267,
regarding gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
63267: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63267
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org
Subject: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 10:46:06 -0400
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello All,

I noticed today that libstdc++.so.1 (and some others), which used to be
part of gcc:lib, are not included in any of the outputs of the
superceding `gcc-toolchain` package.

Is there another method for getting these needed shared libraries in a
guix system at this point? It's entirely possible I'm missing something.

I am CCing guix-devel <at> gnu.org per podiki[m]'s request.

Thanks!

-- 
Christopher Rodriguez
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com,
 Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>, kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com,
 63267-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#63267: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:21:25 +0000
Hi everyone,

Apologies for the long delay on this.

On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:07 PM, Simon Tournier wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am proposing patch#63393 [1] which adds the output lib to
> gcc-toolchain.  Well, quoting the comment:
>
>       ;; The main raison d'ĂȘtre of this "meta-package" is (1) to conveniently
>       ;; install everything that we need, and (2) to make sure ld-wrapper comes
>       ;; before Binutils' ld in the user's profile.
>
> I think, this package gcc-toolchain should be the visible package and
> battery included.
>
> WDYT?
>
> 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63393
>
> Cheers,
> simon

I've just pushed, as b47ae1ecc43baaf726701ab2d2f810ecfaa75428, the
patches from that issue (the first from simon, the second my simplified
one just adding gcc:lib to gcc-toolchain).

This should fix the original bug here, so I am closing. However, it was
raised here and in 63393 about alternatives in how we use gcc-toolchain
outputs. As well as the issue I ran into about make-libstdc++.

So, if anyone would like to change anything from the new status quo,
please open a new issue. At least now we are working from a better
default I would say, with gcc-toolchain including the libraries from
gcc:lib.

Thanks all,
John



This bug report was last modified 1 year and 31 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.