GNU bug report logs - #6320
tail parameter problem

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: "Dave Saville" <dave <at> deezee.org>

Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 12:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#6320: closed (tail parameter problem)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:04:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 23:03:37 +0200
with message-id <874o4ah9au.fsf <at> rho.meyering.net>
and subject line Re: bug#6320: tail parameter problem
has caused the GNU bug report #6320,
regarding tail parameter problem
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
6320: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6320
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "Dave Saville" <dave <at> deezee.org>
To: "bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org" <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Subject: tail parameter problem
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:59:13 +0100 (BST)
Hi

I have just installed the OS/2 port of tail 8.4. It no longer seems to
like the following:

tail -2 foo
tail: option used in invalid context -- 1

tail -n2 foo works.

Is this a change in tail or has the porter messed up?

TIA

-- 
Regards

Dave Saville


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: "Dave Saville" <dave <at> deezee.org>
Cc: 6320-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6320: tail parameter problem
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:03:37 +0200
tags 6320 + notabug
close 6320
thanks

Dave Saville wrote:
> I have just installed the OS/2 port of tail 8.4. It no longer seems to
> like the following:
>
> tail -2 foo
> tail: option used in invalid context -- 1
>
> tail -n2 foo works.
>
> Is this a change in tail or has the porter messed up?

Thanks for the report.
Since it works fine everywhere else, I'd say
it must be the porter who changed something.

I'm closing this issue.


This bug report was last modified 14 years and 46 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.