Subject: Re: bug#63135: [PATCH 0/3] MATCH-RECROD improvements

From: "(" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 19:02:57 +0100

Ludovic Courtès <[email-masked]> writes:
> Hmm that’s “incorrect”, no?
>
> Currently we have:
>
>   (match-record x <x>
>     (field1 field2 …)
>     body …)
>
> Do you mean to move the field list on the first line?

Wait, that's intentional? :)  With this change, wouldn't it be:

```
(match-record x <x>
    (field1 field2)
  body ...)
```

which seems more in line with how other macros with bodies are typically
indented.