From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:37:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#63122: guix refresh wrote the wrong version number Resent-From: Jack Hill Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 63122 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 63122@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16826098355337 (code B ref -1); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:38:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2023 15:37:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59576 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ps3gJ-0001O1-Ao for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:37:15 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ps3gF-0001Nr-BC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:37:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ps3gE-0007t3-Hi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:37:10 -0400 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ps3gC-00037w-QA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:37:10 -0400 Received: from marsh.hcoop.net ([45.55.52.66]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ps3gA-0002Hw-O6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:37:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:36:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Jack Hill X-X-Sender: jackhill@marsh.hcoop.net Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.248.1.95; envelope-from=jackhill@jackhill.us; helo=minsky.hcoop.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hi Guix, While working on the wlroots and sway update [0], I noticed the following odd behavior with `guix refresh`: The problem occurred when using `guix refresh` to update sway. A plain `guix refresh sway` reported correctly that sway could be updated to 1.8.1. However, when I ran `guix refresh -u sway`, the version written to the package definition way 1.8.1.1. However the hash was correct for 1.8.1. Of course building the source for version 1.8.1.1 failed because the corresponding tag couldn't be found (and it wasn't yet in a content-addressed mirror). After correcting the version everything worked as expected. I did this all with a pre-inst-env guix at commit 8093c6ba21c51efe901ba98ce698c545bf13dcd0. Best, Jack [0] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63085 From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:37:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#63122: guix refresh wrote the wrong version number References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: "J. Sims" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63122 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "63122@debbugs.gnu.org" <63122@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 63122-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63122.168262616012718 (code B ref 63122); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 63122) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2023 20:09:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59875 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ps7vb-0003J3-Mu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:09:19 -0400 Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.18]:21411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ps7vX-0003In-Pn for 63122@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:09:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:09:00 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1682626149; x=1682885349; bh=4W6sNCqnHg+Eu5HMtb2Hfm19zNqo/AWQ6E2AszCP4rY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=vKBUUF74Wa6FuGmZFT4aRx06tPvScqhqtGNuEqd7wrHJEGihV8UJcOjna1F6rwx6P ZPb4KY70Bx7lB1QZA5R45aMIT1x9Ux8hXAk3ni7ZFDMCPufgCsdR7xdPIzpXAlhQs8 WOHSPotu3ZhjwZnGKLwX+j0AAcLBxr8La8RwmMGxv/s5sggbEcxQEngLP/thRPhwHj uTJL9S41Hrek4Qk7uALePS0pF2L+owSh3hHq8fevXoL/RM0q+8SKMmo9laoBhjkicR oOyqIvLotcy5QABXiUtBd6vOoMVwt7qTaNAxfX0Ch+j3uxi7FOINNtoBNn5z3w2WnP DQwUnZcoUAutg== From: "J. Sims" Message-ID: <9MBzQZYcooBPAt8nTWHAMgNjV1JpriU7AlpNs2jYODxF3GZoGYipAP82RVXW59KHR6peKanaNiqVBahV7B9sRJ33JU5pJAc9wqhpZItKWuI=@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 12133992:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Just wanted to confirm I've seen exactly the same behavior on a personal pr= oject in my personal Guix channel - an extra ".1" was written at the end of= a version number ending in ".1" while everything else worked fine.