From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 29 21:11:36 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2010 01:11:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIX3w-0006On-4w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:11:36 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIX3u-0006Oi-7c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:11:34 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:56499) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OIX3q-0003Kx-9Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:11:30 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38864 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIX3o-0001dt-Ma for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:11:29 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIX3n-0005Ja-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:11:28 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:56396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIX3n-0005JO-6r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:11:27 -0400 Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so2458362gwb.0 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:11:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=vRRgx9vQg0/czfc5t5NB8haiEZHHeroeLn62aCK82iE=; b=ojDB3+hlDAtE5W+epa42K8IzGkHgtToOjVvT2m5twBnJnPvHr6kM9Sjm1vIEeqJufN dWpcsjQ9gGdM6/u8J0Akj0Hoq3sxzNQrLK9CLmQQRv2btuFuYH6EwUMxmjZ2Q1yuEJWv ufqXl6fviN8u3pSnP/r3q40T6AOT9oUualQzM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Pbrjrci+yWNIcxUDjC44iUobewc5siIRI9vZrdoj6AGhb0i4Tqb1ozw0nBy0+YTXnC bZE63r/PGaR5TFmvNQ1n+5J+R41R6Es5Y6YCM2iB3xranJBUNG+SUqBX58PiOuOa2IuE eHyNuF2KcTKXvymVOow1owme1j9U6UFnfk90o= Received: by 10.101.147.8 with SMTP id z8mr2538569ann.248.1275181886120; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:11:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.44.20 with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:11:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 03:11:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: hi-lock-set-pattern and occur To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) I will never understand font-lock-add-keywords, but here are some thoughts about it and hi-lock-set-pattern. hi-lock-set From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 29 21:48:05 2010 Received: (at 6309) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2010 01:48:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIXdE-0006dm-7T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:48:04 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIXdD-0006dQ-7z for 6309@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 21:48:03 -0400 Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so1810936gyh.3 for <6309@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:47:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8GBUd9u+8z0/US83dAEJ7D/xRCL0heNcntID0enR77Q=; b=FSGvt4S3Ie5aGWiCniKvYvG8sP/lyznUqSDN+TsmM5/FN6+kxmWvsLrTH00lYdak7C 8q+x1YWcmDfGmajRH3gq0lHVSfMA4dIhSwe8oN9X6+UXUY9FXDWuj4lfCEyAq4BywI+6 foB8BXQWvw3oANLlwWSEQWaMfWX8mg+9KIPkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Vwl9otWq9xanpyfdE6AAgbLUAFBMkhW95gDscb7IynG2P9URUOzr4gXVFp1wFGAI/U aN1/Sj2tNwHz+PM4ypw1OYVT7JJdwXk7dzKTHGrWNVwNcEuJeB+BLnHs6XOabXyJINq1 yGHYKEOHQBQvtjjNFSWlvZGHvhgethzydfOIs= Received: by 10.101.3.29 with SMTP id f29mr2772873ani.1.1275184079130; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:47:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.44.20 with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:47:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 03:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6309: hi-lock-set-pattern and occur To: 6309@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6309 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) keyboard got irresponsibly misused by my fingers in some way. Please delete. On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > I will never understand font-lock-add-keywords, but here are some > thoughts about it and hi-lock-set-pattern. > > hi-lock-set > > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 31 10:03:17 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2010 14:03:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ5aH-0003O7-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:03:17 -0400 Received: from pantheon-po14.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ5aF-0003O1-Km for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:03:16 -0400 Received: from furry (dhcp128036014059.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po14.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o4VE3DAq025065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:03:13 -0400 Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F17616D427; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:03:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 6309 Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:03:12 -0400 Message-ID: <87sk58cgnz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) close 6309 severity 6310 wishlist thanks From unknown Sat Aug 09 22:36:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator