From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: gdb@11: Update to 11.2. Resent-From: Pierre Langlois Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 63008@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.168211531027620 (code B ref -1); Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2023 22:15:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41347 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz26-0007BP-Fo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:10 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz22-0007BD-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz20-0002gD-0E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:04 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz1x-0002Wz-9m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:03 -0400 Received: from labiere ([82.69.64.142]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MI5Q5-1q3Vot2sYp-00F9Qs for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 00:14:56 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 28.2 From: Pierre Langlois Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 23:11:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Va9EtUAJ9JEnsskw84Iq1/fbr9AVsmuXYUYgQ/T+kv1PKzdW4MW of4srYZh4X0e5BDIgpE7AiX9mbh/9mPCKEpnFk1BuOrmzjNJ5yGOTIM1UZ4GMcxYHLbJnj5 ORJuFYfRNA1NNlW8hTH6FQzyiNbxSW+AJluEyrl2eVcSrwnbTfHdeJZU0aubjJNi2MMnWtm 9bXEigseyRhxwsosXdUHA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:UirvGeRY/LM=;9lihkF7vfIn1ZcM0/bH2MEkARRU mg9K1eRAATZLrl4rLs9kaj1NZiwY4SYLlgUj1Unjd0y0ODeYLyuhiv9G+ia2nz2UWex1WEyOL +74ZesIa+6CpUIZ+0kdZSy1BePJEgI06YIPlvhbiU2RtbEH3JFmKJdMLLxFe2D2ghueA5w8rJ i/eCkbXNgY5Zkkzwz069odcvg1+RUjEhY2x/lZGIvSQijAwE3ZChAyNP6m0orEGudDH2u+VVO MG6wWKelR9VAla7Inbk7I9MSZDFhwXuT9jbnTeTneJ7ZDyUbNyFjX6nxM59z6t66FY+jUzdyX 6Sh6YU1PtmbRzVEMFAxnUzCCgp+/Q+X1WuCx442ctB2TBJQ5o2ApM1CGLoWpwIj0LWQkRUlo1 cSap9ahKyXAyDnQ6Qspo8KBn4qL7a+WOMCyO0LVOM72u6EP+4YG3r/f8P6IsmJEcYz585S98o ej77OalwwJglplPCVL7P5h8+vZ7XSG76IIjFWVuQTDk0897UZy8ArIBWoBml6hfHgfBlirxDn OEWrDBiKnOuVaAETQ90B9TJ6q9catePRbrv/KL+1RyRO3s4seayjI3WjZxAqDNSeisWBTWthg 3ZzjrfELVEPFJ7QjZ0fswFaoVo5eILnStUtw9KWHV7ZOgzcgkz9b34nSfDRnYEGhcwGUGTW7c dIkpbMVQ1D/xCkeQq8UOZqJAiApQwTTWdfWkSNTJlId5fdxHRa/4WA3t7r++CALBbFbYADM3W YXyDmmffN5ZR8w7reHf9+qimMq9BUYO5Dg0m9gF40W9Ny9W5AQpmcN0akEdMN8Bv2GCKpbZD6 gKIHtpQ+XlKI5VB9qPoC91uXmZXkRFLkKRNlnr3RaN2atf+2hKZWQU1GhrnTgo8TocOHqdX91 UQen6T6TnSRu7T7h3uc7G5UByshapOORpLDE3SS/vB2FmtRebai2j8fVxSAKf1bynK59eL2Nu qEYv9609QQj/U9HxRliOa6JoIYw= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.19; envelope-from=pierre.langlois@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Guix! I'm trying out the core-updates branch on aarch64, and gdb@11 doesn't build with the new glibc, see: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28302 Luckily, the patch was backported to 11.2, so it's a trivial fix! Is this OK to commit? It'll be a big rebuild, I guess it could be bundled with other fixes. Thanks, Pierre --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFMBAEBCgA2FiEEctU9gYy29KFyWDdMqPyeRH9PfVQFAmRDCt0YHHBpZXJyZS5s YW5nbG9pc0BnbXguY29tAAoJEKj8nkR/T31UrggH/3a5lJqS/WYKviav4LAAByO7 msTVoSxwJX1/IVSN1XOl026x+VVCAAa2J4RuK+ZPku6BROKkOl7J4ApzfJjYWFLR I4t8c9gp0aTjR/9Y25ydOZ4LefRT1Z5g3c9bK7W5A5BCz3UXSpjpJsKd8EwqU89Z Eml8juDJuxPUsOtGbxGXTp7Q4UpQDX9+UW4YCeXBjoanDfW5NPiGsf9ZgfhaULY6 TVzZLlUSQHqeiA+6b8gsTRZwtVSHDUoh/IyfUL5qGVUsqdEiXlvzbSBTIdc7txwR VHtzni0i4DR7RcTWatXvBvjsKuOb0oRWxuPYd1MiTG1MLX4l4N/iOqki7hTrbIA= =Rs5s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-gnu-gdb-11-Update-to-11.2.patch >From dd8ab2ac3659057241707f05a5a63910aa1da677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Pierre Langlois Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:53:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gdb@11: Update to 11.2. * gnu/packages/gdb.scm (gdb-11): Update to 11.2. --- gnu/packages/gdb.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm index 82050d9ac5..dfc32ea2fb 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm @@ -48,14 +48,14 @@ (define-module (gnu packages gdb) (define-public gdb-11 (package (name "gdb") - (version "11.1") + (version "11.2") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gdb/gdb-" version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 (base32 - "151z6d0265hv9cgx9zqqa4bd6vbp20hrljhd6bxl7lr0gd0crkyc")))) + "0cif2n3wfg1w8vc1kfnp6358idxa1zj0wjm8m5qqc6w8f5mc75ql")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (outputs '("out" "debug")) (arguments -- 2.39.2 --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 20:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 63008@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.16821945562135 (code B ref 63008); Sat, 22 Apr 2023 20:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2023 20:15:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pqJeG-0000Y1-Fu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:15:56 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:49700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pqJeD-0000HA-Vz for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:15:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B5A395; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T82EJ_7CuU4n; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36150F6; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 22:15:45 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Pierre, we also have gdb@12 in core-updates; does this also not build? Right now none of the two have been built on aarch64 on CI, so I lack an overview. On x86_64, both build; @12 has 101 dependents, @11 7563! This cannot be accomodated on core-updates any more, I am afraid. We will need to build it out afterwards. And probably the best course of action would be to move the dependents to gdb@12; or drop the dependency? Why do so many packages depend on a debugger? Andreas From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Pierre Langlois Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Andreas Enge Cc: 63008@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 63008@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.168236352024940 (code B ref 63008); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2023 19:12:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1bU-0006UC-HG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:12:00 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:55847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1bS-0006Tz-B6 for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:11:59 -0400 Received: from labiere ([82.69.64.142]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M2f5Z-1prrDM3LJv-0049yM; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:11:51 +0200 References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 28.2 From: Pierre Langlois Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 20:04:18 +0100 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:BEQWPY5WfQBk684uZNAOHbV7czqDmwf0UBl5OR4T9WXJvglrViF FAntRT5iVZ9LRQYorB2KaE7VeojWns6CN0m8cgicCVALVTS0P3Yi54wS0SQ2vTPnTMPVIQ7 TWhf1a9OsVFzT8nO8tNXuKXeVlITCaimm+GjwU68vq/dgnrVxEB7dGkF3NeZnJgtT5utDi6 eTjKrjZvk8XwVETCdaq7g== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:gWenIXd3qzQ=;bBNtmqmI5tlOzzxwniS1NX6G/0z 0aTGA1SzHhLWuGf6KIBzltIuvWMB/BdY2z8csmR6Bj4kjaf+2PKG+xdBk3rvjVx7qoxp4jYXK beprjL2/8NBXTpuf8W1yfbVVF4pJhu80FlNzO11TVcEZ1M3ikWqMyfeXEltMuOA+e78d6u678 RL4cei8KUoFZf2y7aXxWSSduSC7gqnFubWf2qIRIhux99/2CdA5goxBRcekXaBopqo0iYPceB 0BIs4Jzh4R6uY308BH8CnWxzK4PMwL+zO2bU5sNTE3rONNXS3GOeDw9UwTgOXImCShomIsrT8 D40Zn+jWoMTHMxtDREJTRkYTNzhIFD0B44KdGmOKTIexKFr0mnzc74yebb2Lvxn0WUC1K3CU3 bQiA+LDP/dyqNhVxG8gpZ5oDjldJ+GILQ5j2S4FnN1R0zfgjk4P5ZDpF6SEQpUX8lLcV1pb4H xTnXsUDJIq0XL+k3qFKPlA5rzeqqB9k3GFu7R3W65TdCpg7LZZUxfITHuhqC0nFBbOyigq274 3NpjXUrMnmAaTbZCBBoBRdZi7J8MJGnngYyldsyc/KBgwDo/6C1m11dLwq4Eh4VzvH8LvRD5E MW++x7PgR2gpx1T2AgOTlyogSBUCAEE1B2824lvgiAWM/rB/Gmg+3z3XsIfz2AXit60XjwyRQ kXc9Y6M73dkFUNBPw7TLSmoxx7URmdu193kwf3ZTBrfhnMxbFlhqe/Tvawaxavr1xgwhrbfYV jHcyaAClwvdDg/Rm2qBhHjcm4LkZSqcPd5M6/pTU0v+KFuUccoYbVz1ZSZWBb585uI0jPcaB/ tnVmY2CkbLOkI2ZSBievUE00GARkw83YmpcStCQ+rmED9eUpwDW22YQ157bN4bsMLr/kdwu/V WMbIyWVxGanIV8Bq0Pq+gJaNVAqh/R6hLlNOq3qdqPcaJzgW6AgIQxT8R5JDeMAgaY+qUm0mT Qhz70DuTlw5iUMXxi8u2lB/Sw6k= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Andreas, sorry I missed your reply! Andreas Enge writes: > Hello Pierre, > > we also have gdb@12 in core-updates; does this also not build? Right now > none of the two have been built on aarch64 on CI, so I lack an overview. Yup, gdb@12 builds just fine for me! > > On x86_64, both build; @12 has 101 dependents, @11 7563! > This cannot be accomodated on core-updates any more, I am afraid. > > We will need to build it out afterwards. And probably the best course > of action would be to move the dependents to gdb@12; or drop the > dependency? Why do so many packages depend on a debugger? Yeah gdb is used as a dependency for testing rust, I'm not sure if it has to be 11, it can probably work with 12 although I haven't tried. I think the main reason we still have gdb 11 is to make sure we don't rebuild the rust world. I'm afraid if we don't do update it know, we'll have to do it quite soon, can the rust world be rebuilt on a staging branch soon after the core-updates merge? I'm concerned that these days a lot relies on rust (via librsvg IIRC), so not having it available might be an issue, even for simple systems :-/. All that being said, it might be possible to add a separate gdb@11.2 package, and only use it for rust on non-x86, in a way that doesn't cause a rebuild, could that work? Thanks, Pierre --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFMBAEBCgA2FiEEctU9gYy29KFyWDdMqPyeRH9PfVQFAmRG1HIYHHBpZXJyZS5s YW5nbG9pc0BnbXguY29tAAoJEKj8nkR/T31UxIQIAIP6Uo+fZGdd2phO8IqulFLc mmeLXhAOhlUTgfoS/YG18HhEGV4S3JsA7uPJyAk0nwPPMfR6fWynGNHRLG7B+4l7 1CfCKbcvLlJNIr3gRCe2M8rnEc0cPjA3dwbn3C2MLv7HHF4l+AC0fJMSckW99Ukh p/LkrU7nCazBpBZ18X6NbsLZGQp3vtX8+faJIiPlFVn6MXjXR8DmFa1VtMCosuC3 F7gY724Y8R6lArq8ZuPEbahb3TEp806GgMYv5ZQpw067KBeC0NDPItaBEK9g2MfS cz3qa18vMNe1z3bIxSx1Q21gD3k/UrycxZ6MtetYWU0n5J500B2c4BDr71qJu5U= =Fc/S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Pierre Langlois Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Pierre Langlois Cc: andreas@enge.fr, 63008@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Andreas Enge , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.168236410325936 (code B ref -1); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2023 19:21:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50354 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1kt-0006kG-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:21:43 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1kr-0006k6-Kn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:21:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1kq-0000Gq-Sg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:21:41 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1ko-0001Yf-Vm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:21:40 -0400 Received: from labiere ([82.69.64.142]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MMGNC-1pXhgV2MjO-00JGrD; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:21:29 +0200 References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 28.2 From: Pierre Langlois Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 20:20:26 +0100 In-reply-to: <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> Message-ID: <87fs8pt7bk.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:E+Xb6FK76R7B3dNTfxJcj3LlOu9MkA69SVQf7qqNPsubU8jDr5i Q/JP/+5NnFk7KyGulpb4beIE0+Jog7BKGqsPqImzPKHwqT2ahNp3PO3Dx0JV28RL66SZQRa kEMAMGM10J7bRFjJZ8BtQHYnW7KWhnYdqfrAZZQ+dZirxhuiS8x6rCoGr9GzauUl16Z5VUr ZhH9mqprefxmmrgYXMmUQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:e2xVWB5/0lE=;aUptmF8yydXQbTp5WP6gFUBjYbT e5S9KMSRjQ6V4L5TiXnrwuSdCndY+PftDVKT/WnOefy+5+dwZfRBHGrW1YOAPoSxw2Wv6Zj+f TLHJaaOcwEPqjsWDcfO7DYy0aoIeh5VmKKr36AT7ylF8Qe8bMoaR38tctYJCJ7AbTfoj+0eX1 BS8XzeixOMh3rHxJKEy7JzhSP4/N6CjuSmN62jG8xhkJNkePDbnMDGV8yI+/RbNG4SHV9TfaJ ym+mVUx03WaWodQ1KzwukKxqK+GJboWvpC94JaQMgrhbRCjjABIHfPWM2ZDWQDaVcRyBiD9Ab /z9bHZEBWTSrkRVSxPE3kUwfrsu4cUizeA0r61hq6PKwgIj/zLsGRLEDSjkwMTqaYgGO7BX7x RTfO7BOC34g/saQIFHs05K3CJaNzjjAjeKNKY3oxq5T2MHcRn0HSvk4j2nba10xPhK5UTA/GF yXZxcAI7xJUjRI+eM56e6xwohmC8R2B/UZbdoKUH7vfwe33gVCKfrMWNxYA76UkvcG3itKZPt Ka5RhY0jvchpjdFk07DGFP/dnaUB43TsbG3rc+fzKQzlHu1Lb/ZvssmuHeEklbuF28ZgV+zWw uptqBskBxX5aygVmUkIOALq7z4y0igfQv93eAf6507pKo/Q91cujNzDOT/H1M3QF+SyFkyfYZ mpIfVNB3+FDgCuPhqV9u8ZvmoQQTeX5dU5ecCTuPE1cFhtr5jomhLJcyDYPqUFdgvF/rzotYZ RETjkQZGqo1D0Hbv4lMlxMem6ctHu8AFS4zk+tJok5j1K1UB1Om5hx2c+YHNb+NOUD2lsja+R o1c6xtQa1nxgmS8a8QcnNLWaraKiuYuzxFLP2BU4+hhTER0SBBWN1RkaoZKwXORhbFsQCNYui yoj4ASuhPi0D0Xak6wzPd6DUi5/MX2SFTki6B1jwrwsQWlNjZAHFNgpJRDj6N69bZJWcblixo FA75JEoGXfQJNbYCxd0FhkuBlDA= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=pierre.langlois@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Langlois writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi Andreas, sorry I missed your reply! > > Andreas Enge writes: > >> Hello Pierre, >> >> we also have gdb@12 in core-updates; does this also not build? Right now >> none of the two have been built on aarch64 on CI, so I lack an overview. > > Yup, gdb@12 builds just fine for me! > >> >> On x86_64, both build; @12 has 101 dependents, @11 7563! >> This cannot be accomodated on core-updates any more, I am afraid. >> >> We will need to build it out afterwards. And probably the best course >> of action would be to move the dependents to gdb@12; or drop the >> dependency? Why do so many packages depend on a debugger? > > Yeah gdb is used as a dependency for testing rust, I'm not sure if it > has to be 11, it can probably work with 12 although I haven't tried. > > I think the main reason we still have gdb 11 is to make sure we don't > rebuild the rust world. I'm afraid if we don't do update it know, we'll > have to do it quite soon, can the rust world be rebuilt on a staging > branch soon after the core-updates merge? I'm concerned that these days > a lot relies on rust (via librsvg IIRC), so not having it available > might be an issue, even for simple systems :-/. > > All that being said, it might be possible to add a separate gdb@11.2 > package, and only use it for rust on non-x86, in a way that doesn't > cause a rebuild, could that work? To illustrate what I mean, here's a WIP patch (it needs comments), AFAICT, this would only be a rebuild on non-x86: --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFMBAEBCgA2FiEEctU9gYy29KFyWDdMqPyeRH9PfVQFAmRG1q8YHHBpZXJyZS5s YW5nbG9pc0BnbXguY29tAAoJEKj8nkR/T31Uo08H/2V80ADGAJAzd516vqkkCo4I bzuHglmopo58MhWfc+6/wFzW9RA6/wfwUWpflZK3yrk334TqK1/la1O8od28m9zx OF3e1a6S3xzkC1h8DxSOrEDxArbYQpp6EnyLJ2aE2wtMVCBHlQ2QnIdn3z5xs1yt s69KAh98VGUErgRL0XXtTkI3jgORU/A5b8erCSS6dudRDMEo90uxsCEETw0AnLGM FGmgAjVCqKNL0QfqV7tdFyb4kzpIL6yK6VdX2Elgu3xZLzpyYCDHwWvbE2G9ZszY sgOmGNe5Ygsv1TssS3IFE3/FBWp12SZG6lAKnk3HI6iKDJHwR2qqYbWKCpCBeKk= =6lm2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=gdb.patch diff --git a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm index 82050d9ac5..d460f3950c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm @@ -146,6 +146,18 @@ (define-public gdb-11 ;; RPC stubs). (supported-systems (fold delete %supported-systems %hurd-systems)))) +(define-public gdb-11.2 + (package + (inherit gdb-11) + (version "11.2") + (source (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gdb/gdb-" + version ".tar.xz")) + (sha256 + (base32 + "xvczsqcbh5y0gx7qrclpna0qzx26sk7lra6y8qzxam1biyzr65qf")))))) + (define-public gdb-12 (package (inherit gdb-11) @@ -166,6 +178,11 @@ (define-public gdb/pinned ;; enough to avoid massive rebuilds. gdb-11) +(define-public gdb-11.2/pinned + ;; This is the fixed version that packages depend on. Update it rarely + ;; enough to avoid massive rebuilds. + gdb-11.2) + (define-public gdb ;; The "default" version. gdb-12) diff --git a/gnu/packages/rust.scm b/gnu/packages/rust.scm index d07f4ef10c..3cc5a4926b 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/rust.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/rust.scm @@ -788,7 +788,9 @@ (define-public rust (format #f "prefix = ~s" (assoc-ref outputs "rustfmt")))) (invoke "./x.py" "install" "rustfmt"))))))) ;; Add test inputs. - (native-inputs (cons* `("gdb" ,gdb/pinned) + (native-inputs (cons* `("gdb" ,(if (target-x86?) + gdb/pinned + gdb-11.2/pinned)) `("procps" ,procps) (package-native-inputs base-rust)))))) --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 20:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Pierre Langlois Cc: 63008@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.168236717231671 (code B ref 63008); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 20:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2023 20:12:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pr2YO-0008El-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:12:52 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pr2YI-0008EU-P5 for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:12:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1F81C26; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:12:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjiRbq6CPj5s; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0:b0aa:56dd:ae73:8afa]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0689425A; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:12:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:12:35 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Pierre, Am Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:04:18PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Langlois: > I think the main reason we still have gdb 11 is to make sure we don't > rebuild the rust world. I'm afraid if we don't do update it know, we'll > have to do it quite soon, can the rust world be rebuilt on a staging > branch soon after the core-updates merge? definitely, there already is a rust-team branch, and the rust team is in the starting block. Discussing gdb in this context would probably be a good idea! Andreas From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 10:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Andreas Enge Cc: Pierre Langlois , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.168241961932391 (code B ref 63008); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 10:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2023 10:46:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prGCJ-0008QN-Bq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:46:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:62877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prGCF-0008Q6-SV for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:46:57 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f1957e80a2so109302885e9.1 for <63008@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:46:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682419610; x=1685011610; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zj4eUd3CGP7BDh1Rg02h4pyt0gd/Qc+l8J6eaYiujR8=; b=FSS7lGZo3+ocLHFTzx6K+pouzMuBz1/S6bCIeUaAEjrM3SJXO5p6pTOhqHKuMfMXCa JneCjTmWgI6TurQ/Xpj9hyvihlOTBh423Zf+6THqdc3kRX4WK+p0RZ+MZ5l8oJr8FX6V iNWOiZCKDrVXUqA2nIeJU1J3VN1C6f9fcdXdUsJzgb2MCXewL5cMpfvjc7E+fl4k1tou eQzQpXuIsTC9FexrHUEPXd8QwcFqIOa4UNo/tetJWdtDYaDcwzF9vpdQHdwtx65KhbFS /TvgQ1pVEq8KnPvehHdAUD86YnPy2xhwBW8BG+KOxuyCnmoSFiOOcEl5WhmpgiOh1J0y 6GCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682419610; x=1685011610; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zj4eUd3CGP7BDh1Rg02h4pyt0gd/Qc+l8J6eaYiujR8=; b=NQ4LLJvFqnolmOPGlFjrqtji3eCLqHrRJJ/roeJNY0969qYqj/dTVipcIbaSZDBkcG CX592n99Ispd7JGEn+OMRD75qdnARg2NhpBjEorfsjQyTIUxalj9O9RK/fGIXnSZYxKo hybFmM+O7aq2HXsX6TQaEPOEOdXpJ6ZT61whPcHLaCAtbnsvYhjYAE5EucdjoOj4gDsQ gUBZaDtm7y64wccIy458VNOwX+V9QcLam697XhBQ4rZUw2mqGtKq1qNmPTNuTc86UL1W Nnp2MG6z4a6e+vu3joKG1U8E7JFvHC284fRp6te9wrGDg8NuR7wtoR//+hzFhFcKm9Nf 4hvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9d1eTcdqFsblFc4Oz/vAtMA0MC5rUayMFgQGwJElvZERcs73wTY 3UGMn+ZmpujvHdvCD8TlFGQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Z3VYPXP4eFpFbibnWZef3RUJSRD4B3L4A+dYTPyAGz1viiRe0alDcuepOQ4o/5D7C2/r0rNg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d88:b0:3ee:93d2:c915 with SMTP id bi8-20020a05600c3d8800b003ee93d2c915mr9960281wmb.6.1682419609883; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:ed3:910:2a00:b62e:99ff:fef0:7bc0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iv18-20020a05600c549200b003f17b91c3adsm18233272wmb.28.2023.04.25.03.46.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:46:47 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Andreas Enge , Pierre Langlois , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QRNFceaNszyyciQ5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) --QRNFceaNszyyciQ5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:12:35PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Pierre, >=20 > Am Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:04:18PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Langlois: > > I think the main reason we still have gdb 11 is to make sure we don't > > rebuild the rust world. I'm afraid if we don't do update it know, we'll > > have to do it quite soon, can the rust world be rebuilt on a staging > > branch soon after the core-updates merge? >=20 > definitely, there already is a rust-team branch, and the rust team is in > the starting block. Discussing gdb in this context would probably be > a good idea! I also noticed that gdb-11.1 failed to build on core-updates on riscv64-linux. I can confirm that gdb-12 does build on riscv64-linux on core-updates. I haven't tried yet to use gdb-12 in place of gdb-11 in the rust tests, but I assume it would work. I'll test it out on x86_64 on core-updates to see if it works. It sounds like as it currently stands neither aarch64 nor riscv64 have a working rust on core-updates. I suppose, in order to decrease the number of rebuilds, we could introduce gdb-11.2 and use that as the gdb input in rust for those two architectures until I can either switch everyone to 11.2 in the rust-team branch or switch everyone to gdb-12. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --QRNFceaNszyyciQ5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmRHr5cACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1F3+w/+LDiqeOL/0LeycVXYSIBoGtMHze1sMfSmXTLbuMMs3+4UhIXUjYFspfJK Hb86Lj1UPWEmYxoqnT+RO1HZgOwyP0QnmwKSEe1ASWsyRF6x6zBzs4Ft3Fsbh7yZ RWf3w9AeACMKwrJ1JQZfn6iFogIk7NY+kVo0UHYR83qpPmZb6sisLJ2hZyTSmV/8 CSnHWVS4CIzpy11s109vvr5OMvlfsYaG1kBMDO1s0bxXKkqTJxmHZ84JNBTBHGTf l6FEHtWCNiu9FNumAxfLC5Dd0T7mXoYguyk+45hbJ8Wt9FhxsJS4gfSnoG8KzcbW jefVKwO5tmHWb2oz1JmmzI5rh7CHtdZc5i7Y/JNnYrf2GBcMxHDGmMEw8bXkw1Cw 21EPPAGiuOfqpMbc7Z/BO3yrnc0FOVSP+PfCX/8TwVlKWe5fl7ia+Ni0s8su0SV3 vWfIVLlMIEskK+4ufNUrVaRrGbjLHEcfhyibKn9EN4nNPVFF8eLLmuZHn8jWWJWB WBXl5Q/f7ud4RYp8glcW+BJqYxgd2KPZKnnRF59OKSCQe1QLGadep6Xl331/lxKX RIJ5F05FZw1wr0IGAl55HatQpAnoYJB7NCend/qw9lFD29yR66Ijil+d6iekzJOF K3/uhIXj2B7kb3U9TnZdCZWtnuGSCfo3/HzhWmoxNFEg45dcvig= =6OX+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QRNFceaNszyyciQ5-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Andreas Enge Cc: Pierre Langlois , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.168242408718216 (code B ref 63008); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2023 12:01:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prHMM-0004jk-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:01:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:58413) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prHMJ-0004jT-2k for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:01:25 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f1e2555b5aso18328025e9.0 for <63008@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 05:01:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682424077; x=1685016077; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aCKewvJuRo0h9K/8LTbQOhSCn69cg+XmOfTg4jTeuCw=; b=SrFvA6zxVOXDpinbJNQWkoDy6YZZEj+DtU7Ab/IYkeweFc5qKVrS6HEXHTadhA8nTm mjVQOorz7beQzTGrv0JRRtp9SXxvEt97j9J3ydMhlGSDjHZGDEYboslwrPNYo6jWLPtk OH3UkK27da8Y8LZoycZZUo4tvaWC9bXCW/akKNvWTsSYd/1GvwEbdI0iUUyFJ9KPIOoD z98ETBPd5YyDjPy3xG8SA5qk2pnkQabeQhF7yjDftb2Eq7ONJwO6rTyy/Axye0sqtNub S8ZFl3AXrNyg84r3nQNnCCqU8rDYEBy9B1draRZRQ40JEmMwedlGvsLzw0BdS+fVMMhX M1Pg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682424077; x=1685016077; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aCKewvJuRo0h9K/8LTbQOhSCn69cg+XmOfTg4jTeuCw=; b=JEodDDx40/wa3qGe5yM109gqxjwJS27drF44nxNYE69ASIWzg+WminwV+nbgd2DSF4 OyD8R82iYhrPRQzTa8Y7NFHFulC7cmEUWH1vY8LabPMU2B2gk8GaaiEVUY/p16B3zCNb 4mr2gM7TLFPNl2H1N5ab5L2xFJN7laI2wYkBfqBwnXInea36RcpCEfFjVo20hzjlb1DT ziFdIne7ro0cMh19/CwbVbXzs4ytV1WYr+MlsEClDEd5fYix0EccU/eownfccrZrD/gJ PnNxw+a3hBQZcf68Xj0E/BZ1TZdfSWPVrg8rkMz+VCkvckIF1hYlR8+dYFELPkCcP/3D d6ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9c2ldAlpkuxFk/l7DHwT2xlInTJGuwxPe196xKqDbQzWXPvlsrM Vsj+0ZJwUHogjt9RFVJYifI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350artOooEOsUzQWuvRjCmLQ6YAQrjkTF0Tx80piemluUK0xh6PI7yvxZV0ihITKsKTt/osfDQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd93:0:b0:3f0:a08e:811b with SMTP id y19-20020a7bcd93000000b003f0a08e811bmr10017968wmj.13.1682424077162; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 05:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:ed3:910:2a00:b62e:99ff:fef0:7bc0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iz14-20020a05600c554e00b003f175954e71sm18191995wmb.32.2023.04.25.05.01.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 05:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:01:15 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Andreas Enge , Pierre Langlois , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dX12GCsik4EzUS5O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) --dX12GCsik4EzUS5O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:12:35PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Pierre, >=20 > Am Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:04:18PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Langlois: > > I think the main reason we still have gdb 11 is to make sure we don't > > rebuild the rust world. I'm afraid if we don't do update it know, we'll > > have to do it quite soon, can the rust world be rebuilt on a staging > > branch soon after the core-updates merge? >=20 > definitely, there already is a rust-team branch, and the rust team is in > the starting block. Discussing gdb in this context would probably be > a good idea! I was able to build rust-1.60 on core-updates on x86_64 using gdb-minimal. IMO we should switch to that for aarch64/riscv64 and then I'll switch x86_64 over to it later in the rust-team branch. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --dX12GCsik4EzUS5O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmRHwQsACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Eg1xAAkGWAfbe7qf1pQlYxyNHeibzT35C2TZJCzwD05QG6fXq1bQYvLXq8iq1/ Yava3syQSDZUIq3Vr12u6imy6bXxSiNhgdElNPEk+LLmhZoqe2wDbnhS1oqyxYwg 6CcAxyCmym/ZanSDJxgNcb9VLH7k3cBpruVpVNh0aHxl6XH53iRe3Geum8esIRVF lEME0Jv+0qrikF+IFzJ3SqDbkcNen02+MU1Ro63VlSrhhlYsG74ay/Ag3N1FSNKy smwzGIntZyPSRreuqAYTVijqwFOQHczUREQ2wtkkM7w1tD2QGIbyMKSimxoeTQKj GjfuQmqnNlDmILUHGPV2UwfuTGnKqhZIH592QGwBq8daQUU02S6frNlzJlHgktBP cw9nIQVLXi736akH4exeMua3HCo71VF2IHdb6dVc6riMT5442Us9HkpzPxwCGj/l 7ipdxzIHxKAqYonktwDaM5DqKozGzj0RMxgGVIvtrfwN7EvY7zyxwwvJJWXOAQ6s MphbH5IifRQXcMD+Ofcy1UQKLPt1Q3QXCaC3zx9LTG2tY1+cO+6sJ1xIhADTAUrU sol2vWTbMfjysHcun2qoM5z8g0Pgc2Eg0qWcZNa5Pq1nVCqOeNpJeBeSJnljo//u XpnBUdbEKaOeN1hjyTAQaYtFY/eZ6z+pdoencCncLr9rzrWbC80= =5Mti -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dX12GCsik4EzUS5O-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner , Pierre Langlois , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.168242796311879 (code B ref 63008); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2023 13:06:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prIMt-00035X-55 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:06:03 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:47720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prIMq-000350-2Q for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:06:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2935165A; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:05:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RQZESHXanes; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:05:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60C1D1D3; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:05:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:05:51 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Efraim, Am Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 01:46:47PM +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > It sounds like as it currently stands neither aarch64 nor riscv64 have a > working rust on core-updates. I am not sure whether it works, but at least it builds on aarch64: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/37421/details This is rust-1.60, our publicly visible version; internally we are at 1.65, which I suppose the rust-team branch is going to make visible soon. I also see a few green dots of rust-* packages in the dashboard, alongside many red dots; a random sample of them shows they suffer from the infamous cuirass bug "cannot build missing derivation". So I think we are good as far as core-updates is concerned, and you can make the changes on the rust-team branch when you see fit. Andreas From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 07:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63008 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner , Pierre Langlois , 63008@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 63008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63008.168249269115157 (code B ref 63008); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 07:05:01 +0000 Received: (at 63008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2023 07:04:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54142 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prZCt-0003wP-6g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 03:04:51 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:60306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prZCo-0003w8-Ok for 63008@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 03:04:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B2B476; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:04:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yUHRPq5wuf3; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:04:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B75DB3CB; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:04:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:04:37 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 03:05:51PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > I am not sure whether it works, but at least it builds on aarch64: > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/37421/details > This is rust-1.60 It was also the version from January, while the current one does not build. Sorry for the noise, and looking forward to the rust-team branch merge! Andreas From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:39 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Pierre Langlois Subject: bug#63008: closed (Re: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64) Message-ID: References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 63008 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 63008@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 20:01:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1684612862-14795-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1684612862-14795-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #63008: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: gdb@11: Update to 11.2. which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 63008@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 63008: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D63008 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1684612862-14795-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 63008-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 May 2023 20:00:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59428 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q0Skp-0003py-Di for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 May 2023 16:00:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:61715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q0Skm-0003pi-An for 63008-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 May 2023 16:00:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f435658d23so43815475e9.3 for <63008-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 20 May 2023 13:00:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684612830; x=1687204830; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uFKvlonWplPTAx9Sp3g94roxrFG5W+ThPrFJ2zjwc2s=; b=DMFduqqPxMEVZJzsl4A05RNfsDnyldGAt2VM/q5iR6ahOvLssCeaDTRO8JjeB7GtjX zjZgh3MsacZgquOmbNUXAD0BGt9NKrSwlRl325PQvyB7mTd5vuklaBPThAMX9Qmd2PeY biinnxX386kLFkqBAqpsfNmRdWYQ03nPqbzX3PnPhDqOlIWIKWpy5kzeGAcPB+2pP42H l9FItJkkmWLtKxVxgpM2mzu0q1X0lUayGXXGXZfVHGl4zVFQv9xb2J9dg8kKFfI68l/7 aHw/jUVrBg3VjOpdipdQ/91ObRkLSiS95JbYfP83oqrN3hGkMAq0ks80Laqsg6Ldl9Gs +Z3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684612830; x=1687204830; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uFKvlonWplPTAx9Sp3g94roxrFG5W+ThPrFJ2zjwc2s=; b=OojHLGUXJkDz/JN0HEN1ldlbC/6uPzhvbn+2w6g3tC9oETAdEcdBQcIIcN3ach/b6l HeaTDX+VTcPMDm4iHUoU+cQWVyw/EUjfnLS3zq9KyugcQ/AgMThd/qVJa2oJA8zVf6x0 LDB6xFkplDeeaNy5TuFhtEqp4ntgZWbNQuF0/5qAzYUVYL/1Xo7F9jIZ+1mGYyVjohje 4JNdZtB9ay5rwNcCV2IhG1gSkqh/bYta/RgOZKK0WpZ4BmvUcXWv6uTdlMcIcoBi7rhw dolihDu2PNy72saUIstg5gjr3Gy40IRFCPDhqF0j1BHK4F0MF7+pLKTdDcRSP0qso56R Yr4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxWxnH9F6B+NI/ZXYsEpnj71LEbdlMilBXVf7v8vPZPRDhJsuAB 0oKOvOCqoHRmoMU6XfVQX+MLsQ2IIyUxWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7POvArPtPucl/7rxzPG7fBjDGyKMFIL06ElLX3TViLo7QctTdC6R9/dmyTg+fSBVoVQ6IE3g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce87:0:b0:3f1:979f:a733 with SMTP id q7-20020a7bce87000000b003f1979fa733mr4527253wmj.31.1684612830427; Sat, 20 May 2023 13:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([37.46.46.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9-20020a1cf209000000b003f3e50eb606sm3154856wmc.13.2023.05.20.13.00.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 May 2023 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 23:00:46 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner To: Andreas Enge , Pierre Langlois , 63008-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#63008] gdb on aarch64 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Andreas Enge , Pierre Langlois , 63008-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> <87jzy1t7rh.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8yO8aQdaCwW6oRTd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63008-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) --8yO8aQdaCwW6oRTd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 03:01:15PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:12:35PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > > Hello Pierre, > >=20 > > Am Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:04:18PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Langlois: > > > I think the main reason we still have gdb 11 is to make sure we don't > > > rebuild the rust world. I'm afraid if we don't do update it know, we'= ll > > > have to do it quite soon, can the rust world be rebuilt on a staging > > > branch soon after the core-updates merge? > >=20 > > definitely, there already is a rust-team branch, and the rust team is in > > the starting block. Discussing gdb in this context would probably be > > a good idea! >=20 > I was able to build rust-1.60 on core-updates on x86_64 using > gdb-minimal. IMO we should switch to that for aarch64/riscv64 and then > I'll switch x86_64 over to it later in the rust-team branch. I've since switched rust to using gdb-12.1 and removed gdb-11 from Guix. Closing this bug! --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --8yO8aQdaCwW6oRTd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmRpJu4ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1F0DA/+IQSlytzT3ro7SSH4JE1/1SyZzp21kEuO/CNs9YfzMsBBska3fIBlyx7/ M/ZF18c1QKlRfFTXe5qE3zivJyDs1gG5hKZhzxI0FviYvO6pEa3qNYV1e1cIfgl/ JKeVLy1JAdt61emhdmqfedynM1ubBCsxckbwjOtlPW0Ag1hulvBBBgwHMOryrBco OeBrWE3qMdVciMA6aik6WqwO2uq//OyLMq5/3gf2C89b71q9EmfAEGUwqTMjPEXj Bm4Hk0oO6sfVmy7Hdsl55fGJtKaAnDB9U2m1g+B2IdXWRcxSJcKK6vSKNMSXaFCg MU89Vg/kkVQCbd0SXhK+1vcxCOh2m+a7ntbe87xHsNE/a4oGbpbI0KXX/tfx5QWi lj1H9jtdFxoWOt8rjEXdlqRakrDU70c7N2PMYWlYvQFWZGbkSVetIIiUgQ0iOa6K jqExuNth+tRotn8vK4SgLT3YkjIk+5WNqf1KqXdbBNy9lyjy21YK1Z9t0tSkmYht R1gZM57XGEqABQVcU6YRBmA8ldTPnOl/xWwJ9XSbsvptT7RcBxQKQ8dAWQQgG/+z aMasf3fbCtS4K8chmnRccdWJPLCa58AFXR5KraJRJ++xPl5B6Ho78CBTYB+M6jyj vf/0SYThjJCPuAt82e3wiNzTkQhdZno2CKYLdvVhneCRGvKszGo= =1V5B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8yO8aQdaCwW6oRTd-- ------------=_1684612862-14795-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2023 22:15:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41347 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz26-0007BP-Fo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:10 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz22-0007BD-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz20-0002gD-0E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:04 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppz1x-0002Wz-9m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:15:03 -0400 Received: from labiere ([82.69.64.142]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MI5Q5-1q3Vot2sYp-00F9Qs for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 00:14:56 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 28.2 From: Pierre Langlois To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: gdb@11: Update to 11.2. Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 23:11:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87pm7wvq5e.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Va9EtUAJ9JEnsskw84Iq1/fbr9AVsmuXYUYgQ/T+kv1PKzdW4MW of4srYZh4X0e5BDIgpE7AiX9mbh/9mPCKEpnFk1BuOrmzjNJ5yGOTIM1UZ4GMcxYHLbJnj5 ORJuFYfRNA1NNlW8hTH6FQzyiNbxSW+AJluEyrl2eVcSrwnbTfHdeJZU0aubjJNi2MMnWtm 9bXEigseyRhxwsosXdUHA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:UirvGeRY/LM=;9lihkF7vfIn1ZcM0/bH2MEkARRU mg9K1eRAATZLrl4rLs9kaj1NZiwY4SYLlgUj1Unjd0y0ODeYLyuhiv9G+ia2nz2UWex1WEyOL +74ZesIa+6CpUIZ+0kdZSy1BePJEgI06YIPlvhbiU2RtbEH3JFmKJdMLLxFe2D2ghueA5w8rJ i/eCkbXNgY5Zkkzwz069odcvg1+RUjEhY2x/lZGIvSQijAwE3ZChAyNP6m0orEGudDH2u+VVO MG6wWKelR9VAla7Inbk7I9MSZDFhwXuT9jbnTeTneJ7ZDyUbNyFjX6nxM59z6t66FY+jUzdyX 6Sh6YU1PtmbRzVEMFAxnUzCCgp+/Q+X1WuCx442ctB2TBJQ5o2ApM1CGLoWpwIj0LWQkRUlo1 cSap9ahKyXAyDnQ6Qspo8KBn4qL7a+WOMCyO0LVOM72u6EP+4YG3r/f8P6IsmJEcYz585S98o ej77OalwwJglplPCVL7P5h8+vZ7XSG76IIjFWVuQTDk0897UZy8ArIBWoBml6hfHgfBlirxDn OEWrDBiKnOuVaAETQ90B9TJ6q9catePRbrv/KL+1RyRO3s4seayjI3WjZxAqDNSeisWBTWthg 3ZzjrfELVEPFJ7QjZ0fswFaoVo5eILnStUtw9KWHV7ZOgzcgkz9b34nSfDRnYEGhcwGUGTW7c dIkpbMVQ1D/xCkeQq8UOZqJAiApQwTTWdfWkSNTJlId5fdxHRa/4WA3t7r++CALBbFbYADM3W YXyDmmffN5ZR8w7reHf9+qimMq9BUYO5Dg0m9gF40W9Ny9W5AQpmcN0akEdMN8Bv2GCKpbZD6 gKIHtpQ+XlKI5VB9qPoC91uXmZXkRFLkKRNlnr3RaN2atf+2hKZWQU1GhrnTgo8TocOHqdX91 UQen6T6TnSRu7T7h3uc7G5UByshapOORpLDE3SS/vB2FmtRebai2j8fVxSAKf1bynK59eL2Nu qEYv9609QQj/U9HxRliOa6JoIYw= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.19; envelope-from=pierre.langlois@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Guix! I'm trying out the core-updates branch on aarch64, and gdb@11 doesn't build with the new glibc, see: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28302 Luckily, the patch was backported to 11.2, so it's a trivial fix! Is this OK to commit? It'll be a big rebuild, I guess it could be bundled with other fixes. Thanks, Pierre --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFMBAEBCgA2FiEEctU9gYy29KFyWDdMqPyeRH9PfVQFAmRDCt0YHHBpZXJyZS5s YW5nbG9pc0BnbXguY29tAAoJEKj8nkR/T31UrggH/3a5lJqS/WYKviav4LAAByO7 msTVoSxwJX1/IVSN1XOl026x+VVCAAa2J4RuK+ZPku6BROKkOl7J4ApzfJjYWFLR I4t8c9gp0aTjR/9Y25ydOZ4LefRT1Z5g3c9bK7W5A5BCz3UXSpjpJsKd8EwqU89Z Eml8juDJuxPUsOtGbxGXTp7Q4UpQDX9+UW4YCeXBjoanDfW5NPiGsf9ZgfhaULY6 TVzZLlUSQHqeiA+6b8gsTRZwtVSHDUoh/IyfUL5qGVUsqdEiXlvzbSBTIdc7txwR VHtzni0i4DR7RcTWatXvBvjsKuOb0oRWxuPYd1MiTG1MLX4l4N/iOqki7hTrbIA= =Rs5s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-gnu-gdb-11-Update-to-11.2.patch >From dd8ab2ac3659057241707f05a5a63910aa1da677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Pierre Langlois Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:53:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gdb@11: Update to 11.2. * gnu/packages/gdb.scm (gdb-11): Update to 11.2. --- gnu/packages/gdb.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm index 82050d9ac5..dfc32ea2fb 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm @@ -48,14 +48,14 @@ (define-module (gnu packages gdb) (define-public gdb-11 (package (name "gdb") - (version "11.1") + (version "11.2") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gdb/gdb-" version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 (base32 - "151z6d0265hv9cgx9zqqa4bd6vbp20hrljhd6bxl7lr0gd0crkyc")))) + "0cif2n3wfg1w8vc1kfnp6358idxa1zj0wjm8m5qqc6w8f5mc75ql")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (outputs '("out" "debug")) (arguments -- 2.39.2 --=-=-=-- ------------=_1684612862-14795-1--