GNU bug report logs - #62892
proposal to extend mark-sexp to go forward and backward on command

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Zachary Kanfer <zkanfer <at> gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: ruijie <at> netyu.xyz, 62892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: bug#62892: proposal to extend mark-sexp to go forward and backward on command
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:07:03 +0300

> From: Zachary Kanfer <zkanfer <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 01:04:30 -0400
> Cc: ruijie <at> netyu.xyz, 62892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> 
> It's able to be worked around, yes -- but I think it's easier to have separate methods for forward and
> backward, the way we do for so many other commands. For one, having separate functions makes it
> easier to start moving backward, (rather than giving a -1 prefix argument.

Adding functions and commands is not free, it does come with a price:
they need to be documented in our two manuals (something your patch
neglected to do, btw), users need to learn them, etc.

So I wonder whether on balance it is justified to add this.  Lars,
Stefan: any comments or opinions?

Does anyone else have an opinion?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.