From unknown Sat Jun 14 18:46:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#6278 <6278@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#6278 <6278@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode Reply-To: bug#6278 <6278@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 01:46:07 +0000 retitle 6278 Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode reassign 6278 emacs submitter 6278 Lennart Borgman severity 6278 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 26 23:09:12 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2010 03:09:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHTT6-0005j7-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHTT4-0005j2-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:11 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:34082) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OHTT0-0004uh-N8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:06 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44183 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHTSz-0000Iq-1J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHTSx-0001gJ-AR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:04 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:43689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHTSx-0001gE-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:03 -0400 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so4985874gyg.0 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 20:09:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=BGOL6fsx+tLnOsEgA78VkRJms9wUENk5o7S2A3hHeVY=; b=qOz3zFRtZitkXJrkSnNzu8pwtd9NFVmdzxCOOn8rJ6nmTzD3Jn0wZOTr7NsQqobwWN xn5hovkim8QdeJjzw3LmWfjXYdKx+vwE4664dvCdSxriNgdyvM3NWAI0ch3y7eHsrM6e GvtVVXDED9avCdNWWQSYlp66MffEmWxYtOCSA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=whP8u+iLuo2ybG8xeSXZJBGbrVYBpHT6aMIZzu9zaeMrQ8YOSRS3h3koqz3kcfp37h hcUeKHJ5umGp2S1/q7NRkBiF9U2T8N/aIKx9ZbLvhASjaTySuNhJjiC3EU80Ah6eO8y4 3mp+bs5a69PP2CB65M/TDmJ2y/agpdKmyBhec= Received: by 10.101.11.22 with SMTP id o22mr11760684ani.159.1274929742279; Wed, 26 May 2010 20:09:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 20:08:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 05:08:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) I get a segmentation fault on w32 at Emacs exit if server-mode is enabled and with -Q. This is with a trunk checkout from 2010-05-22. *** Here is a backtrace and the last messages from gdb: warning: BTMMHOOK 27.05.2010 05:01:44 Thread<0E68> Hook DLL loaded [New Thread 3168.0xf98] warning: BTMMHOOK 27.05.2010 05:01:52 Thread<0A24> Hook DLL unloaded Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7c809eda in KERNEL32!IsBadReadPtr () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll (gdb) bt #0 0x7c809eda in KERNEL32!IsBadReadPtr () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll #1 0x5f180000 in ?? () #2 0x03105cce in ?? () from C:\Program Files\Tall Emu\Online Armor\oawatch.dll #3 0x030f33d7 in ?? () from C:\Program Files\Tall Emu\Online Armor\oawatch.dll #4 0x03108476 in ?? () from C:\Program Files\Tall Emu\Online Armor\oawatch.dll #5 0x0310949e in ?? () from C:\Program Files\Tall Emu\Online Armor\oawatch.dll #6 0x030f3ea0 in ?? () from C:\Program Files\Tall Emu\Online Armor\oawatch.dll #7 0x030f41d6 in ?? () from C:\Program Files\Tall Emu\Online Armor\oawatch.dll #8 0x7c90118a in ntdll!LdrSetAppCompatDllRedirectionCallback () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll #9 0x030f0000 in ?? () #10 0x7c923ada in ntdll!RtlDestroyQueryDebugBuffer () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll #11 0x7c81caae in KERNEL32!IsValidLocale () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll #12 0x7c81cb26 in KERNEL32!ExitProcess () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll #13 0x77c39d45 in strerror () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll #14 0x77c39e78 in msvcrt!_initterm () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll #15 0x77c39e90 in msvcrt!exit () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll #16 0x01002ed6 in Fkill_emacs (arg=46135322) at emacs.c:2093 #17 0x01022d0f in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0x82f450) at eval.c:3073 #18 0x0116e455 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=19032417, vector=19032437, maxdepth=20) at bytecode.c:680 #19 0x0102344d in funcall_lambda (fun=19032389, nargs=1, arg_vector=0x82f694) at eval.c:3260 #20 0x01022f2c in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x82f690) at eval.c:3119 #21 0x0116e455 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=19032649, vector=19032669, maxdepth=12) at bytecode.c:680 #22 0x0102344d in funcall_lambda (fun=19032621, nargs=1, arg_vector=0x82f914) at eval.c:3260 #23 0x01022f2c in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x82f910) at eval.c:3119 #24 0x0116d94f in Fcall_interactively (function=47311594, record_flag=46135322, keys=46156549) at callint.c:869 #25 0x01022d63 in Ffuncall (nargs=4, args=0x82fb90) at eval.c:3079 #26 0x010228a3 in call3 (fn=46281234, arg1=47311594, arg2=46135322, arg3=46135322) at eval.c:2901 #27 0x01014299 in Fcommand_execute (cmd=47311594, record_flag=46135322, keys=46135322, special=46135322) at keyboard.c:10397 #28 0x010069d5 in command_loop_1 () at keyboard.c:1755 #29 0x010206bf in internal_condition_case (bfun=0x1006315 , handlers=46192882, hfun=0x1005d06 ) at eval.c:1510 #30 0x0100607a in command_loop_2 () at keyboard.c:1356 #31 0x010201b0 in internal_catch (tag=46191050, func=0x1006057 , arg=46135322) at eval.c:1246 #32 0x01006030 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1335 #33 0x01005922 in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:950 #34 0x01005a86 in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:1012 #35 0x0100284d in main (argc=2, argv=0xa94348) at emacs.c:1782 Lisp Backtrace: "kill-emacs" (0x82f454) "save-buffers-kill-emacs" (0x82f694) "save-buffers-kill-terminal" (0x82f914) "call-interactively" (0x82fb94) (gdb) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 27 13:43:16 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2010 17:43:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHh6y-0005UA-8G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:43:16 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHh6w-0005U2-C6 for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:43:15 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3300E00AGI7O00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:42:23 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.111.84]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3300CIKAIM4J70@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:42:23 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:42:29 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Lennart Borgman Message-id: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 05:08:42 +0200 > Cc: > > I get a segmentation fault on w32 at Emacs exit if server-mode is > enabled and with -Q. This is with a trunk checkout from 2010-05-22. Do you mean to say that a recipe for reproducing this is emacs -Q M-: (server-start) RET C-x C-c ? And that this happens consistently, every time you do the above steps? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 27 13:46:19 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2010 17:46:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHh9v-0005WC-4N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:46:19 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHh9s-0005W7-Ty for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:46:17 -0400 Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so178803gyh.3 for <6278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DZBGsAW6OvDcjDuk06XlfWEwWugaR+YJwrN92WrfWB4=; b=UymioxHmRIq1ZNPl8is3Ha/vpMs691vPdLmMz1CLhsV8KY5L3stlJYxVZreRrMw4m6 fDBu6RBUnw4UTnL56+87czWqAeXxLsjqyXPQYf6kjjjP+mN10RihQrz0WyUvRpVJhIWR K8qg4wbpHiNooBVF6edyU64iNN5RDqlFgR4MI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wYgSuEJ6au7HVcS/JkUguQhciwevKJdkvRSAogW5Hefwl49SnrxyRToUm2jWQFXkby DwnQt0BtBt297ZJJ5DKdsP+2RzT6SDrOY5qvJkl2l9kawOrj6LqJsq7kPvYCWRj4ioi/ 7rOv+mRai6MfHS/b7waMeYMH98baXytk7Ajl4= Received: by 10.101.6.33 with SMTP id j33mr12722535ani.126.1274982371175; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:46:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:45:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 05:08:42 +0200 >> Cc: >> >> I get a segmentation fault on w32 at Emacs exit if server-mode is >> enabled and with -Q. This is with a trunk checkout from 2010-05-22. > > Do you mean to say that a recipe for reproducing this is > > =C2=A0emacs -Q > =C2=A0M-: (server-start) RET > =C2=A0C-x C-c > > ? =C2=A0And that this happens consistently, every time you do the above > steps? Yes, but there is no visible crash. It is just the debugger that says this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 28 08:14:56 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2010 12:14:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHySm-0006B4-H3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 08:14:56 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.211.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHySj-0006Az-NQ for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 08:14:54 -0400 Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so600646ywh.0 for <6278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 May 2010 05:14:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fnuM6ILt+yxPqvrWGOLpY/Ni1gp/F2OZZvku2FxKg9c=; b=m9sQ+b00ri7ijXL49ZvJs8wZ7GCU8pAx0vdhqUdc2F0GF6sl0qUcEDeIZsankBWmCx Zxju6kW7klX33YibzipZEzgNDQcAr4AgdlFahYAZPLlc9SKlcNf2Oy81JIoMh6Y7LWm5 RJGqrgrfpYtl9ul8x1QaTKeAiRTdYN82YPJcw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MrJrqAnCnLorRqNYtCqOekXMCCC2mVVPBgEjwRzqjV2DkN2UlPdXpU2qDhdlGDW6HK gmeXph8EMYnv8vw8J0zDOgKHqOa4D7owavc8KZga3Ug5nld0MfUEepZLz/14fNb/g8G/ I1onr/ENexhC5PAPw1r4d4W2TNw5pP/pUbkO0= Received: by 10.101.11.29 with SMTP id o29mr262493ani.64.1275048888179; Fri, 28 May 2010 05:14:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 05:14:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:14:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) >> Do you mean to say that a recipe for reproducing this is >> >> =C2=A0emacs -Q >> =C2=A0M-: (server-start) RET >> =C2=A0C-x C-c >> >> ? =C2=A0And that this happens consistently, every time you do the above >> steps? > > Yes, but there is no visible crash. It is just the debugger that says thi= s. It looks like this was the same problem as bug 6284. I do not see this problem now that I am using the patch for 6284. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 28 20:05:23 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2010 00:05:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OI9YI-0002lJ-Q3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 20:05:23 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OI9YG-0002lE-OI for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 20:05:21 -0400 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so1343817gwj.3 for <6278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:05:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+kY/T1jTeVrcFbCSdUw23Nf4HmmRWJvIDa+oWYqnEwM=; b=lGTugigXXsSTk8FWX9jxzL3iN2pWRWqmpiYtn9qg6S9cLTVrTV+0IwthsS4CTy3ouh JH/kg8wXJXUkx9W+sdjoCwAffCIs36CvWFVsDWufjGvtjVudEaTA54XVNyI6SYpH/g8A Y4R+NhtxgG6QcNTaCtlpbM8hiQlGHvWZG+td8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=rc174JVMNuRRhzjOb9WeeEOcfh8R484jw0IwHjEqBtAexbgoqsrU9FsXUCby1OI0ox 6vAqoB9/7Zkr0lCW0ebnCwsu0wWhn1OxPnwhe5H2mY7//AWTdblCLgsyiszRUsyPgAfr Bo+jEAmQ2gWWong7GH0l6odbxz10npXlRiPbI= Received: by 10.101.5.22 with SMTP id h22mr1368175ani.104.1275091516541; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:05:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:04:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 02:04:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > > It looks like this was the same problem as bug 6284. I do not see this > problem now that I am using the patch for 6284. Too optimistic ;-) I just saw it again. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 28 21:46:27 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2010 01:46:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIB87-0003Rs-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 21:46:27 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIB86-0003Rn-2c for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 21:46:26 -0400 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so1380000gwj.3 for <6278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 May 2010 18:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b4b0pPCUtXmAhUmFwwMzBhRH21XjKNt1mtIPpToAnlQ=; b=hwVPtE5m1+4Ibn6bPagB3VLHWho9TNdYdQMRDtJqHTY6pVCOwAm+pGY1Mg+PqoTW7j za1Qq7ilEcECAcRNxOwM/JYHjm1V1SXlDrCZVqEojt+a7VStELsFxj7qjm+z54e74R7/ 82r2qcKXhYQDqEA+yvJHqZ2lNIEnh3YAP573c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=YQzH3imbHcz73s37ZvLEHch46j+uJoJRSyBZ/AWIk6MpEvY108d8mmh3IUgm2BkVvt w7dXFeEcoy4Wo2IpazkUKFg/WP0bf9q3DNAx0tdt83IzEJLSZKyS8K+yCJexESOjchUI boa9zT6mtciSxCFXfFZ663//k8HAgIoCHGvN0= Received: by 10.100.244.32 with SMTP id r32mr1323409anh.28.1275097582194; Fri, 28 May 2010 18:46:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 18:46:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 03:46:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Lennart Borgman > wrote: >> >> It looks like this was the same problem as bug 6284. I do not see this >> problem now that I am using the patch for 6284. > > Too optimistic ;-) > > I just saw it again. I just saw this in dbg. It might be related but I am not sure since I believe I got an error from make-frame in this instance. This error might of course have to do with the current bidi work. My checkout is from 2010-05-22 (and patched). #24 0x011d3277 in w32_abort () at w32fns.c:8183 #25 0x010b87d9 in check_glyph_memory () at dispnew.c:2610 #26 0x01002f8d in shut_down_emacs (sig=0, no_x=0, stuff=45467674) at emacs.c:2198 #27 0x01002eb4 in Fkill_emacs (arg=45467674) at emacs.c:2104 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 29 02:33:29 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2010 06:33:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFbt-0005Iw-Mr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:33:29 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFbq-0005Ir-Bw for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:33:27 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3600M004TX3000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:26 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.111.84]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3600KZJ4TVYP20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:20 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:20 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Lennart Borgman Message-id: <83typrtdzf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 03:46:02 +0200 > Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org > > I just saw this in dbg. It might be related but I am not sure since I > believe I got an error from make-frame in this instance. > > This error might of course have to do with the current bidi work. It's hard to do anything about such a crash without having a clear recipe for reproducing it, starting with "emacs -Q". Whatever problem caused it, happened before you invoked kill-emacs, and in a different place. > My checkout is from 2010-05-22 (and patched). > > #24 0x011d3277 in w32_abort () at w32fns.c:8183 > #25 0x010b87d9 in check_glyph_memory () at dispnew.c:2610 > #26 0x01002f8d in shut_down_emacs (sig=0, no_x=0, stuff=45467674) > at emacs.c:2198 > #27 0x01002eb4 in Fkill_emacs (arg=45467674) at emacs.c:2104 Please show the function check_glyph_memory in your sources, with line numbers. check_glyph_memory can abort in two different places, and your sources are different from the current trunk, so it's hard to know which one actually aborted. Also, is this an optimized build or non-optimized one? If the former, the line numbers shown by the debugger cannot be trusted. Finally, what are the values of glyph_matrix_count and glyph_pool_count in frame #25? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 29 02:43:33 2010 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2010 06:43:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFlc-0005OM-VD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:43:33 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFla-0005OH-OT for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:43:31 -0400 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so1466329gwj.3 for <6278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 May 2010 23:43:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CBTBJswQnXiEdloldjv6s5WcAR8aptP2aXoXkqV3zaI=; b=biOzEDD3hYtpnOjm+yef1jxnzcDSxKGlDwGz2G6H7v32PuFFZ3vGt0ty7vUTkNemTO VHlV/r+qF7l9ytsFfPPkiuPZdJLXvHs3vMIX3CpFHVam8gsjEJnF+Op6RvPYnt2v9ECE 9QjIMHhZpl4BCunTP7OOBX17GqP0Cm01V5ah0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XQLXnk8YbC5/VIsaNBMuXQwtfD0EeM9v7fMgRvLymf94CFl84smujjqKBTmenKuHld R4yZMxIr44+a6CbkQV+a8fL4NuleBIz0PjMxMsVL+LR3HTtNkL8vL155N2jipFGe/Evr 7/r2yiLn63z7L9MF9UaKB1nQQBaL98N1rFY2E= Received: by 10.101.156.18 with SMTP id i18mr1613454ano.180.1275115407231; Fri, 28 May 2010 23:43:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 23:43:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83typrtdzf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> <83typrtdzf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 08:43:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 03:46:02 +0200 >> Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> I just saw this in dbg. It might be related but I am not sure since I >> believe I got an error from make-frame in this instance. >> >> This error might of course have to do with the current bidi work. > > It's hard to do anything about such a crash without having a clear > recipe for reproducing it, starting with "emacs -Q". =C2=A0Whatever probl= em > caused it, happened before you invoked kill-emacs, and in a different > place. Yes, of course, but I have no better information. >> My checkout is from 2010-05-22 (and patched). >> >> #24 0x011d3277 in w32_abort () at w32fns.c:8183 >> #25 0x010b87d9 in check_glyph_memory () at dispnew.c:2610 >> #26 0x01002f8d in shut_down_emacs (sig=3D0, no_x=3D0, stuff=3D45467674) >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 at emacs.c:2198 >> #27 0x01002eb4 in Fkill_emacs (arg=3D45467674) at emacs.c:2104 > > Please show the function check_glyph_memory in your sources, with line > numbers. =C2=A0check_glyph_memory can abort in two different places, and > your sources are different from the current trunk, so it's hard to > know which one actually aborted. It aborts here (line 2610): if (glyph_matrix_count) abort (); > Also, is this an optimized build or non-optimized one? non-optimized. > Finally, what are the values of glyph_matrix_count and > glyph_pool_count in frame #25? Sorry, I had to reboot. If this happens again I will look at it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 13 20:08:50 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2010 01:08:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSJNo-0003xf-Uo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:08:49 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSJNn-0003xU-EH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:08:47 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37515) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSJTl-0008I8-0D; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:14:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19718.50448.538972.277852@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:14:56 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: emacs merge X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: magenta X-Ran: xuUm:r4cg5JfXMz]y}V6.a08h#GVG-?XCW!Xs`A.(*dL X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) merge 6278 7628 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 16:45:51 2011 Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2011 20:45:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqtBO-0000aq-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:45:51 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqtBL-0000ai-RQ for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:45:48 -0400 Received: from furball (173-9-75-145-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.9.75.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p79Kia2W011004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <6278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:44:37 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:35 -0400 Message-ID: <877h6mtivg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6278 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Since this bug report is for a modified Emacs, and no one else has reported anything similar, and no additional information has been forthcoming, I am closing it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 16:46:07 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2011 20:46:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqtBe-0000bd-5f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:46:06 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqtBb-0000bW-OI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:46:04 -0400 Received: from furball (173-9-75-145-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.9.75.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p79KiqEH011080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:44:53 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 6278 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:52 -0400 Message-ID: <87vcu68gcb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) close 6278 thanks From unknown Sat Jun 14 18:46:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator