GNU bug report logs - #62751
29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>

Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.90

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: jonas <at> bernoul.li, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 62751 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:46:46 -0700
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> I installed the below patch on emacs-29 to take care of this part.
>>
>> diff --git a/admin/make-tarball.txt b/admin/make-tarball.txt
>> index 505d3469d3c..5704e8e8922 100644
>> --- a/admin/make-tarball.txt
>> +++ b/admin/make-tarball.txt
>> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ Steps to take before starting on the first pretest
>> in any release sequence:
>>      You can use 'gnupload --delete' (see below for more gnupload details).
>>      (We currently don't bother with this.)
>>
>> +4.  Check that all new Lisp libraries belong to sensible packages.
>> +    Run "make -C lisp finder-data" and check the diff of the generated
>> +    file against the previously released Emacs version to see what has
>> +    changed.
>> +
>
> This could benefit from some criteria for what is and isn't reasonable
> in these diffs, or what to do with the differences.  Because otherwise
> "check the diff" doesn't tell how to check it.

I didn't put anything, because I don't know how to summarize that in a
few short words.  Ideas for how to do that are welcome.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 278 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.