GNU bug report logs - #62751
29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages

Previous Next

Full log

Message #124 received at 62751 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: jonas <at> bernoul.li, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 62751 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned
 to packages
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 16:56:23 +0300

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 06:11:28 -0700
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> 
> Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li> writes:
> 
> >> Do we have some way to list new additions to package--builtins?
> >
> > Run "make finder-data" and then look at the diff?
> 
> I installed the below patch on emacs-29 to take care of this part.
> 
> diff --git a/admin/make-tarball.txt b/admin/make-tarball.txt
> index 505d3469d3c..5704e8e8922 100644
> --- a/admin/make-tarball.txt
> +++ b/admin/make-tarball.txt
> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ Steps to take before starting on the first pretest
> in any release sequence:
>      You can use 'gnupload --delete' (see below for more gnupload details).
>      (We currently don't bother with this.)
> 
> +4.  Check that all new Lisp libraries belong to sensible packages.
> +    Run "make -C lisp finder-data" and check the diff of the generated
> +    file against the previously released Emacs version to see what has
> +    changed.
> +

This could benefit from some criteria for what is and isn't reasonable
in these diffs, or what to do with the differences.  Because otherwise
"check the diff" doesn't tell how to check it.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.