GNU bug report logs - #62750
29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade'

Previous Next

Full log

Message #35 received at 62750 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>, Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>,
 62750 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and
 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade'
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:44:43 +0000

Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibility
>>> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29),
>>> then I'd be in favor.
>>
>> What are compatibility aliases?  I must have missed something?
>
> I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding
> the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a
> "compatibility alias").
>
> I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, so
> we don't need such a compatibility alias.

If this were to happen, I'd like to also be able to rename the analogous
package-vc commands to upgrade as well.

(On a related topic I have been wondering if package-update should
handle package-vc packages at all, or if that was a mistake?)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.