GNU bug report logs - #62750
29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>

Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:54:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>, Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 62750 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade'
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:22:03 -0400
>> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibility
>> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29),
>> then I'd be in favor.
>
> What are compatibility aliases?  I must have missed something?

I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding
the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a
"compatibility alias").

I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, so
we don't need such a compatibility alias.


        Stefan





This bug report was last modified 2 years and 80 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.