GNU bug report logs -
#62720
29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot
Previous Next
Reported by: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:11:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.0.60
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 27/04/2023 13:44, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:00:51 +0300
>> Cc: jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, philipk <at> posteo.net, 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>> monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, larsi <at> gnus.org, joaotavora <at> gmail.com
>> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
>>
>>> And what about the renaming you suggested in another bug report?
>>
>> Still waiting for your go-ahead. Although it sounds like I have it.
>
> No one objected, AFAIU. So I think you can install that.
Thank you, done.
>>> As for PROBLEMS, I'm not sure. We usually put there only something
>>> that people actually complain about, not proactively. How about
>>> mentioning this in the doc string instead?
>>
>> Sure. Hopefully it won't create an impression that the described
>> behavior is _intended_.
>
> We can say something like "Currently, ..." to make that clear.
Very good, I've used that and an additional clarification for a
recommended alternative. Please see how you like it, or whether it needs
improving.
Before the next pretest is cut, I'd also like to bring up the question
again of backporting the patch for bug#62816 (with Joao's support:
previously mentioned in
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62720#517, for example).
It improves the part of Eldoc that is not used by default
(eldoc-documentation-strategy has a different value) but which is used
by Eglot since it changes that variable in its managed buffers.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 17 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.