GNU bug report logs - #62720
29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:11:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.60

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #811 received at 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
Cc: jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, philipk <at> posteo.net, 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 joaotavora <at> gmail.com, larsi <at> gnus.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages
 like Eglot
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:44:08 +0300
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:00:51 +0300
> Cc: jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, philipk <at> posteo.net, 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, larsi <at> gnus.org, joaotavora <at> gmail.com
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
> 
> > And what about the renaming you suggested in another bug report?
> 
> Still waiting for your go-ahead. Although it sounds like I have it.

No one objected, AFAIU.  So I think you can install that.

> > As for PROBLEMS, I'm not sure.  We usually put there only something
> > that people actually complain about, not proactively.  How about
> > mentioning this in the doc string instead?
> 
> Sure. Hopefully it won't create an impression that the described 
> behavior is _intended_.

We can say something like "Currently, ..." to make that clear.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 17 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.