GNU bug report logs -
#62720
29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot
Previous Next
Reported by: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:11:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.0.60
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #601 received at 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:31:52 +0100
> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>, jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> philipk <at> posteo.net, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, larsi <at> gnus.org
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:02 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Please in the meantime, allow me add to eglot.el:
>
> (defun eglot-update () "Update Eglot regardless of package.el policy."
> (interactive)
> (unless package-archive-contents (package-refresh-contents))
> (package-install (cadr (assoc 'eglot package-archive-contents))
>
> This will allow at least Eglot users to weather the storm until Emacs
> 30. I know you forbade this in the past, but now that more "facts and
> subtleties" have come to light, maybe you can reconsider? I'll readily
> deprecate this function when a solution has been found for the next
> Emacs. It doesn't really affect anyone but Eglot users and these
> are, in your own admission, already negatively affected anyway, so
> what is there to lose?
I didn't forbid it. I said I'd prefer not to have it in Emacs, and I
still do.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 17 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.