GNU bug report logs - #62720
29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:11:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.60

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #446 received at 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora <at> gmail.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages
 like Eglot
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:41:52 +0000
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: joaotavora <at> gmail.com,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,  62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>>   larsi <at> gnus.org
>> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:40:01 +0000
>> 
>> > Hmm... looks identical to the previous patch you sent, which changes
>> > package-install?  Or what am I missing?
>> >
>> > As for the question I asked: I'm okay with changing package-install if
>> > there are no objections from those who proposed to change
>> > package-upgrade instead.
>> 
>> Did I send the wrong patch.  I double-checked now and this one should be
>> using package-update:
>
> Thanks.  It doesn't seem to be simpler than the change in
> package-install, perhaps even more complex than that.
>
> What is your preference? change package-install or package-update?  I
> tend to the former.

I have no preference either way.  If you think that package-install is
fine, and João has expressed interest in that route as well, we might as
well go that way.

-- 
Philip Kaludercic




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 17 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.